Player Stats

Charles Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
378
Receptions
34

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonNorthwestern2214034.8
2009 Regular SeasonNorthwestern4865042.2
2010 Regular SeasonNorthwestern916198058.2
2011 Regular SeasonNorthwestern68101052.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Northwestern paired 198 primary output with 63.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · Northwestern

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

16.8

Efficiency

70.6

Usage

5.9

Consistency

70.2

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 26. Iowa: 21. Penn State: 27. Nebraska: 10. Rice: 0. Minnesota: 17

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 2 by 86.7. Iowa: 2 by 70. Penn State: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 1 by 66.7. Rice: 1 by 0. Minnesota: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins13.3 · Games = 4 · -10.8 vs Losses
Losses24 · Games = 2 · +10.8 vs Wins