Player Stats

Ryan McCants College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
415
Rushing yards
376
Receiving yards
39
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonOregon State1129236060.1
2008 Regular SeasonOregon State1133831424260.1
2009 Regular SeasonOregon State429254035.4
2010 Regular SeasonOregon State319145027.5
2011 Regular SeasonOregon State00000-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Oregon State paired 367 primary output with 38.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 39.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Win with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Oregon State

Games

3

Scrimmage Yards / G

6.3

Efficiency

39.4

Usage

3

Consistency

56.9

Best Game by takeover score

California

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 5. California: 10. UCLA: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 41.7. California: 3 by 34.7. UCLA: 1 by 41.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins7.5 · Games = 2 · +3.5 vs Losses
Losses4 · Games = 1 · -3.5 vs Wins