Player Stats

Kyle Jefferson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
701
Receptions
48
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 PostseasonWisconsin10327071.9
2007 Regular SeasonWisconsin1023385271.9
2008 Regular SeasonWisconsin714189056.8
2009 Regular SeasonWisconsin3435031.7
2010 Regular SeasonWisconsin3465057.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 412 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 95.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Austin Peay

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

21.7

Efficiency

95.6

Usage

7.6

Consistency

93.9

Best Game by takeover score

Austin Peay

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 21. San José State: 18. Austin Peay: 26

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 1 by 100. San José State: 1 by 100. Austin Peay: 2 by 86.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half19.5 · Games = 2 · -6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half26 · Games = 1 · +6.5 vs First Half