Player Stats

Terrell Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
782
Receptions
84
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonBuffalo115036.5
2008 Regular SeasonBuffalo0-00-
2009 Regular SeasonBuffalo1125250153.8
2010 Regular SeasonBuffalo1243397375.1
2011 Regular SeasonBuffalo715130144.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Buffalo paired 397 primary output with 56.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · Buffalo

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

18.6

Efficiency

54.7

Usage

19.1

Consistency

26.8

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 40. Stony Brook: 7. Ball State: 0. UConn: 0. Tennessee: 19. Ohio: 64. Temple: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 6 by 44.4. Stony Brook: 1 by 46.7. Tennessee: 3 by 42.2. Ohio: 5 by 85.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins35.5 · Games = 2 · +23.7 vs Losses
Losses11.8 · Games = 5 · -23.7 vs Wins