Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2008-2011Temple
Chester Stewart
QB • 6'3" • Hanover, MD, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chester Stewart is a balanced quarterback profile with 17 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
62.5
Consistency
40.1
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Temple
08091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chester Stewart, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Temple. Chester Stewart is a balanced quarterback profile with 17 usage in the latest tracked season.
Chester Stewart played QB for Temple. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chester Stewart recorded 2,529 passing yards, 303 rushing yards, and 4 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Temple.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Temple paired 882 primary output with 47.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 62.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Temple
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
99.6
Efficiency
62.5
Usage
17
Consistency
40.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 41. Penn State: 44. Maryland: 183. Toledo: 220. Ball State: 184. Buffalo: 61. Bowling Green: 58. Ohio: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 5 by 75.4. Penn State: 15 by 51.7. Maryland: 18 by 86.9. Toledo: 35 by 53.4. Ball State: 19 by 79.2. Buffalo: 14 by 54.4. Bowling Green: 23 by 49. Ohio: 3 by 50
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins117.3 · Games = 4 · +35.3 vs Losses
Losses82 · Games = 4 · -35.3 vs Wins
First Half122 · Games = 4 · +44.8 vs Second Half
Second Half77.3 · Games = 4 · -44.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
86.9 vs Maryland
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 11/3 | @ Ohio | L 31-35 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Bowling Green | L 10-13 | 7 | 13 | 66 | 53.8 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 10 | -8 | -0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Buffalo | W 34-0 | 7 | 11 | 58 | 63.6 | 0 | 0 | 54.4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Ball State | W 42-0 | 10 | 13 | 160 | 76.9 | 1 | 0 | 79.2 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Toledo | L 13-36 | 10 | 20 | 173 | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 53.4 | 15 | 47 | 3.10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Maryland | W 38-7 | 9 | 9 | 140 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 86.9 | 9 | 43 | 4.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Penn State | L 10-14 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 51.7 | 9 | 16 | 1.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Akron | W 41-3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 75.4 | 3 | 23 | 7.70 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 602 | 40.6 | 22.1 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 551 | 43.6 | 8.9 | -51 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Temple | 882 | 47.7 | 18.8 | 331 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 797 | 62.5 | 17 | -85 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
220
Primary metric
220 total offense with 53.4 efficiency.
#2
Maryland
183
Primary metric
Win with 183 yards of offense and 86.9 efficiency.
183 total offense with 86.9 efficiency.
#3
Akron
173
Primary metric
Win with 173 yards of offense and 64.5 efficiency.
173 total offense with 64.5 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
193
Primary metric
Game with 193 yards of offense and 55.2 efficiency.
193 total offense with 55.2 efficiency.
#5
Central Michigan
194
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
194 total offense with 46.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Temple
882 primary output · 47.7 efficiency · 18.8 usage
59.9
#2
2011 Regular Season · Temple
52.4
797 primary · 62.5 efficiency · 17 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Temple
42.1
602 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 22.1 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8111
DeMatha Catholic · Hyattsville, MD
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,832
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.