Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2007-2011Temple
TE • 6'4" • Lancaster, PA, USA
Matt Balasavage reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
53.3
Consistency
100
Season Value
45.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Temple
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Balasavage, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Temple. Matt Balasavage reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Matt Balasavage played TE for Temple. Across 5 tracked seasons, Matt Balasavage recorded 72 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2007 with Temple.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Temple paired 42 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
8
Efficiency
53.3
Usage
10
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/1 | vs Toledo | L 13-36 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2007-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Temple | 42 | 100 | 10.8 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | -42 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 1 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 1 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Temple | 21 | 70 | 6.5 | 20 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 8 | 53.3 | 10 | -13 |
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23
Primary metric
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Temple
42 primary output · 100 efficiency · 10.8 usage
75.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Temple
49.9
21 primary · 70 efficiency · 6.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Temple
45.4
8 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 10 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7933
Lancaster Catholic · Lancaster, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
72
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.