Player Stats

Roddy Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,259
Rushing yards
1,846
Receiving yards
413
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonGeorgia Tech1337325062.8
2008 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech13808658150562.8
2009 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech113453450340.9
2010 PostseasonGeorgia Tech1317170050.9
2010 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech13455336119550.9
2011 PostseasonGeorgia Tech13372017056.3
2011 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech13560438122656.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Georgia Tech paired 845 primary output with 71.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 73.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Win with 124 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Georgia Tech

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

45.9

Efficiency

73.1

Usage

8.2

Consistency

57.9

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah: 37. Western Carolina: 26. Middle Tennessee: 63. Kansas: 124. North Carolina: 59. NC State: 64. Maryland: 6. Virginia: 28. Miami: 16. Clemson: 52. Virginia Tech: 7. Duke: 37. Georgia: 78

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 8 by 44.3. Western Carolina: 1 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 93.8. Kansas: 5 by 100. North Carolina: 8 by 80.7. NC State: 5 by 90.6. Maryland: 2 by 31.3. Virginia: 4 by 72.9. Miami: 3 by 55.6. Clemson: 4 by 100. Virginia Tech: 3 by 24.3. Duke: 4 by 88.5. Georgia: 12 by 68

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.9 · Games = 8 · +20.7 vs Losses
Losses33.2 · Games = 5 · -20.7 vs Wins