Usage / Role
91%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2009Georgia Tech
RB • 6'0" • Marietta, GA, USA
Jonathan Dwyer leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.9 efficiency.
Usage / Role
91%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
39
Developing production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
43
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Georgia Tech
Snapshot
Player Story
Jonathan Dwyer built his college career from 2007 through 2009 as a running back from Marietta, GA wearing No. 21, spending time with Georgia Tech. The clearest part of Jonathan Dwyer's career was his backfield work:...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Jonathan Dwyer, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Georgia Tech. Jonathan Dwyer leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.9 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 11 | 62 | 62 | 0 | 2 | 37.5 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 11 | 391 | 374 | 17 | 7 | 37.5 |
| 2008 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 13 | 133 | 67 | 66 | 0 | 85.1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13 | 1,471 | 1,328 | 143 | 13 | 85.1 |
| 2009 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 14 | 61 | 49 | 12 | 0 | 75.3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 14 | 1,371 | 1,346 | 25 | 14 | 75.3 |
Related Context
Jonathan Dwyer played RB for Georgia Tech. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jonathan Dwyer recorded 3,226 rushing yards, 263 receiving yards, and 36 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Georgia Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,604 primary output with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
102.3
Efficiency
58.9
Usage
27.7
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 61. Jacksonville State: 95. Clemson: 66. Miami: 7. North Carolina: 158. Mississippi State: 83. Florida State: 113. Virginia Tech: 82. Virginia: 125. Vanderbilt: 186. Wake Forest: 189. Duke: 110. Georgia: 33. Clemson: 124
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 16 by 37.8. Jacksonville State: 7 by 100. Clemson: 18 by 38.2. Miami: 5 by 14.6. North Carolina: 19 by 84.6. Mississippi State: 16 by 54. Florida State: 15 by 76.9. Virginia Tech: 20 by 42.7. Virginia: 25 by 52.1. Vanderbilt: 22 by 85.2. Wake Forest: 23 by 84.2. Duke: 14 by 81.8. Georgia: 14 by 24.6. Clemson: 26 by 48.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Jacksonville State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/6 | vs Iowa | L 14-24 | 14 | 49 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.8 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Clemson100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 39-34 | 24 | 110 | 4.60 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 4.8 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Georgia | L 24-30 | 14 | 33 | 2.40 | 1 | — | — | 2.4 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Duke100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 49-10 | 14 | 110 | 7.90 | 2 | — | — | 7.9 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Wake Forest100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-27 | 23 | 189 | 8.20 | 1 | — | — | 8.2 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Vanderbilt100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 56-31 | 22 | 186 | 8.50 | 3 | — | — | 8.5 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Virginia100 rush yards | W 34-9 | 25 | 125 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Virginia Tech | W 28-23 | 20 | 82 | 4.10 | 0 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Florida State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 49-44 | 14 | 102 | 7.30 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 42-31 | 16 | 83 | 5.20 | 1 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs North Carolina100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 24-7 | 19 | 158 | 8.30 | 0 | — | — | 8.3 |
| Thu 9/17 | @ Miami | L 17-33 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | — | — | 1.4 |
| Thu 9/10 | vs Clemson | W 30-27 | 18 | 66 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Jacksonville State2+ TD | W 37-17 | 7 | 95 | 13.60 | 2 | — | — | 13.6 |
Player Story
Jonathan Dwyer built his college career from 2007 through 2009 as a running back from Marietta, GA wearing No. 21, spending time with Georgia Tech. The clearest part of Jonathan Dwyer's career was his backfield work: 3,226 rushing yards, 517 carries, 35 rushing touchdowns, and 263 receiving yards across 38 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2008 with Georgia Tech. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 263 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 38 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Georgia Tech.
The arc is straightforward: Jonathan Dwyer moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Georgia Tech
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 453 | 45.8 | 14.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 453 | 45.8 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 1,604 | 71 | 29.7 | 1,151 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 1,604 | 71 | 29.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 1,432 | 58.9 | 27.7 | -172 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 1,432 | 58.9 | 27.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Florida State
Week 10 · W 31-28 · Conference game
Win with 175 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
175
Scrimmage Yards
95 takeover
175 scrimmage yards and 29.8 usage.
#2
vs Wake Forest
Week 10 · W 30-27 · Conference game
189
Scrimmage Yards
94.5 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
189 scrimmage yards and 34.8 usage.
#3
@ Vanderbilt
Week 9 · W 56-31
186
Scrimmage Yards
89.9 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
186 scrimmage yards and 30.1 usage.
#4
@ North Carolina
Week 11 · L 7-28 · Conference game
157
Scrimmage Yards
87.4 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
157 scrimmage yards and 34.4 usage.
#5
vs Duke
Week 6 · W 27-0 · Conference game
159
Scrimmage Yards
86.5 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
159 scrimmage yards and 33.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Postseason · Georgia Tech
1,604 primary output · 71 efficiency · 29.7 usage
85.1
#2
2008 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
85.1
1,604 primary · 71 efficiency · 29.7 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Georgia Tech
75.3
1,432 primary · 58.9 efficiency · 27.7 usage
17
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
11
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.