Player Stats

Jonathan Dwyer College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,489
Rushing yards
3,226
Receiving yards
263
Touchdowns
36

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2007 PostseasonGeorgia Tech1162620237.5
2007 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1139137417737.5
2008 PostseasonGeorgia Tech131336766085.1
2008 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech131,4711,3281431385.1
2009 PostseasonGeorgia Tech14614912075.3
2009 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech141,3711,346251475.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Georgia Tech paired 1,604 primary output with 71 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 58.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Georgia Tech

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

102.3

Efficiency

58.9

Usage

27.7

Consistency

73.8

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 61. Jacksonville State: 95. Clemson: 66. Miami: 7. North Carolina: 158. Mississippi State: 83. Florida State: 113. Virginia Tech: 82. Virginia: 125. Vanderbilt: 186. Wake Forest: 189. Duke: 110. Georgia: 33. Clemson: 124

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 16 by 37.8. Jacksonville State: 7 by 100. Clemson: 18 by 38.2. Miami: 5 by 14.6. North Carolina: 19 by 84.6. Mississippi State: 16 by 54. Florida State: 15 by 76.9. Virginia Tech: 20 by 42.7. Virginia: 25 by 52.1. Vanderbilt: 22 by 85.2. Wake Forest: 23 by 84.2. Duke: 14 by 81.8. Georgia: 14 by 24.6. Clemson: 26 by 48.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins121 · Games = 11 · +87.3 vs Losses
Losses33.7 · Games = 3 · -87.3 vs Wins