Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2007-2009Georgia Tech
Jonathan Dwyer
RB • 6'0" • Marietta, GA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jonathan Dwyer leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
58.9
Consistency
73.8
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Georgia Tech
070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Georgia Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Dwyer, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Georgia Tech. Jonathan Dwyer leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.9 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,604 primary output with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Georgia Tech
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
102.3
Efficiency
58.9
Usage
27.7
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 61. Unknown: 95. Clemson: 66. Miami: 7. North Carolina: 158. Mississippi State: 83. Florida State: 113. Virginia Tech: 82. Virginia: 125. Vanderbilt: 186. Wake Forest: 189. Duke: 110. Georgia: 33. Clemson: 124
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 16 by 37.8. Unknown: 7 by 100. Clemson: 18 by 38.2. Miami: 5 by 14.6. North Carolina: 19 by 84.6. Mississippi State: 16 by 54. Florida State: 15 by 76.9. Virginia Tech: 20 by 42.7. Virginia: 25 by 52.1. Vanderbilt: 22 by 85.2. Wake Forest: 23 by 84.2. Duke: 14 by 81.8. Georgia: 14 by 24.6. Clemson: 26 by 48.5
Split Comparison
Wins123.6 · n=10 · +89.9 vs Losses
Losses33.7 · n=3 · -89.9 vs Wins
First Half83.3 · n=7 · -38 vs Second Half
Second Half121.3 · n=7 · +38 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/6 | vs Iowa | L 14-24 | 14 | 49 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.8 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Clemson100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 39-34 | 24 | 110 | 4.60 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 4.8 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Georgia | L 24-30 | 14 | 33 | 2.40 | 1 | — | — | 2.4 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Duke100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 49-10 | 14 | 110 | 7.90 | 2 | — | — | 7.9 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Wake Forest100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-27 | 23 | 189 | 8.20 | 1 | — | — | 8.2 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Vanderbilt100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 56-31 | 22 | 186 | 8.50 | 3 | — | — | 8.5 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Virginia100 rush yards | W 34-9 | 25 | 125 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Virginia Tech | W 28-23 | 20 | 82 | 4.10 | 0 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Florida State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 49-44 | 14 | 102 | 7.30 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 42-31 | 16 | 83 | 5.20 | 1 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs North Carolina100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 24-7 | 19 | 158 | 8.30 | 0 | — | — | 8.3 |
| Thu 9/17 | @ Miami | L 17-33 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | — | — | 1.4 |
| Thu 9/10 | vs Clemson | W 30-27 | 18 | 66 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 7 | 95 | 13.60 | 2 | — | — | 13.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Tech
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 453 | 45.8 | 14.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 453 | 45.8 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 1,604 | 71 | 29.7 | 1,151 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 1,604 | 71 | 29.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 1,432 | 58.9 | 27.7 | -172 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 1,432 | 58.9 | 27.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with 175 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
175
Primary metric
175 scrimmage yards and 29.8 usage.
#2
Wake Forest
189
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
189 scrimmage yards and 34.8 usage.
#3
Unknown
138
Primary metric
Game with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
138 scrimmage yards and 13.8 usage.
#4
Vanderbilt
186
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
186 scrimmage yards and 30.1 usage.
#5
Mississippi State
161
Primary metric
Win with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
161 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Georgia Tech
1,604 primary output · 71 efficiency · 29.7 usage
71.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
71.3
1,604 primary · 71 efficiency · 29.7 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Georgia Tech
64.2
1,432 primary · 58.9 efficiency · 27.7 usage
Milestones
19
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
11
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9532
Kell · Marietta, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,489
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.