Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2008-2012Miami
Robert Marve
QB • 6'1" • Tampa, FL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Robert Marve is a balanced quarterback profile with 13 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
55.8
Consistency
57.8
Season Value
56.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Miami
08091011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Miami • Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robert Marve, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Miami. Robert Marve is a balanced quarterback profile with 13 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Miami paired 1,412 primary output with 52 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 55.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, Purdue.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with 350 yards of offense and 68.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Purdue
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
173.6
Efficiency
55.8
Usage
13
Consistency
57.8
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 228. Unknown: 304. Notre Dame: 118. Michigan: 44. Wisconsin: 20. Minnesota: 97. Penn State: 125. Iowa: 280. Illinois: 170. Indiana: 350
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 44 by 51.5. Unknown: 45 by 61.5. Notre Dame: 24 by 54.1. Michigan: 11 by 40.2. Wisconsin: 11 by 43.3. Minnesota: 19 by 66.8. Penn State: 41 by 46.5. Iowa: 37 by 69.5. Illinois: 31 by 56.2. Indiana: 30 by 68.8
Split Comparison
Wins266.7 · n=3 · +161.3 vs Losses
Losses105.3 · n=6 · -161.3 vs Wins
First Half142.8 · n=5 · -61.6 vs Second Half
Second Half204.4 · n=5 · +61.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
69.5 vs Iowa
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-58 | 21 | 34 | 212 | 61.8 | 2 | 2 | 51.5 | 10 | 16 | 1.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Indiana300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-35 | 20 | 29 | 348 | 69.0 | 4 | 1 | 68.8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Illinois | W 20-17 | 18 | 26 | 173 | 69.2 | 1 | 0 | 56.2 | 5 | -3 | -0.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Iowa | W 27-24 | 25 | 33 | 266 | 75.8 | 2 | 0 | 69.5 | 4 | 14 | 3.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | L 9-34 | 22 | 39 | 138 | 56.4 | 0 | 0 | 46.5 | 2 | -13 | -6.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-44 | 11 | 19 | 97 | 57.9 | 2 | 0 | 66.8 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-38 | 3 | 9 | 43 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 43.3 | 2 | -23 | -11.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Michigan | L 13-44 | 5 | 8 | 43 | 62.5 | 0 | 1 | 40.2 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-20 | 11 | 18 | 119 | 61.1 | 1 | 0 | 54.1 | 6 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 30 | 38 | 295 | 78.9 | 3 | 1 | 61.5 | 7 | 9 | 1.30 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami
2008
Opening stop
- 2
Purdue
2009-2012
Final stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Miami | 1,412 | 52 | 16.7 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -1,412 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 544 | 50.9 | 15.4 | 544 |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 684 | 55.2 | 8.8 | 140 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 684 | 55.2 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Purdue | 1,736 | 55.8 | 13 | 1,052 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,736 | 55.8 | 13 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
209
Primary metric
209 total offense with 70.2 efficiency.
#2
Notre Dame
230
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
230 total offense with 52.1 efficiency.
#3
Virginia Tech
165
Primary metric
Win with 165 yards of offense and 59.5 efficiency.
165 total offense with 59.5 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
97
Primary metric
Game with 97 yards of offense and 85.6 efficiency.
97 total offense with 85.6 efficiency.
#5
Texas A&M
206
Primary metric
Win with 206 yards of offense and 58.7 efficiency.
206 total offense with 58.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Miami
1,412 primary output · 52 efficiency · 16.7 usage
59.4
#2
2012 Postseason · Purdue
56.6
1,736 primary · 55.8 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
56.6
1,736 primary · 55.8 efficiency · 13 usage
Milestones
3
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
10
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9373
Plant · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Miami
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,376
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.