Usage Score
31.1
Player Dossier
2007-2010Miami
Leonard Hankerson
WR • 6'3" • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Leonard Hankerson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92
Consistency
74.6
Season Value
74.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami
07080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Miami
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Leonard Hankerson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami. Leonard Hankerson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Miami paired 1,156 primary output with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Miami
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
88.9
Efficiency
92
Usage
31.1
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 71. Unknown: 115. Ohio State: 90. Pittsburgh: 36. Clemson: 147. Florida State: 72. Duke: 80. North Carolina: 51. Virginia: 90. Maryland: 66. Georgia Tech: 132. Virginia Tech: 79. South Florida: 127
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 6 by 78.9. Unknown: 6 by 100. Ohio State: 7 by 85.7. Pittsburgh: 3 by 80. Clemson: 7 by 100. Florida State: 5 by 96. Duke: 6 by 88.9. North Carolina: 4 by 85. Virginia: 6 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 100. Georgia Tech: 3 by 100. Virginia Tech: 6 by 87.8. South Florida: 9 by 94.1
Split Comparison
Wins85.3 · n=6 · -2.8 vs Losses
Losses88.2 · n=6 · +2.8 vs Wins
First Half87.3 · n=7 · -3.5 vs Second Half
Second Half90.8 · n=6 · +3.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Notre Dame | L 17-33 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-23 | — | 9 | 127 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Virginia Tech | L 17-31 | — | 6 | 79 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards | W 35-10 | — | 3 | 132 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 79 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Maryland | W 26-20 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Virginia | L 19-24 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs North Carolina | W 33-10 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Duke | W 28-13 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Florida State | L 17-45 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 30-21 | — | 7 | 147 | 21 | 21 | 3 | 65 |
| Thu 9/23 | @ Pittsburgh | W 31-3 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Ohio State | L 24-36 | — | 7 | 90 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 9/2 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 2 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Miami | 63 | 67.3 | 8.2 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Miami | 140 | 75.6 | 13 | 77 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Miami | 140 | 75.6 | 13 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Miami | 801 | 89.6 | 18.2 | 661 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Miami | 801 | 89.6 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Miami | 1,156 | 92 | 31.1 | 355 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Miami | 1,156 | 92 | 31.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Duke
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 94.1 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Tech
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida State
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Miami
1,156 primary output · 92 efficiency · 31.1 usage
74.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Miami
74.4
1,156 primary · 92 efficiency · 31.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Miami
61.3
801 primary · 89.6 efficiency · 18.2 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Liberty Hill · Liberty Hill, TX
- Committed To
- Hawai'i
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,160
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.