Usage / Role
9%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2010Pittsburgh
FB • 6'2" • Elysburg, PA, USA
Henry Hynoski leans balanced backfield option traits and 46 efficiency.
Usage / Role
9%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
20
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Player Story
Henry Hynoski built his college career from 2008 through 2010 as a FB from Elysburg, PA wearing No. 27, spending time with Pittsburgh. The clearest part of Henry Hynoski's career was his receiving role: 40 catches,...
Read the storyHenry Hynoski, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Henry Hynoski leans balanced backfield option traits and 46 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 34.4 |
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 11 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 52.3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 11 | 196 | 107 | 89 | 1 | 52.3 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 11 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 54 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 11 | 188 | 33 | 155 | 1 | 54 |
Related Context
Henry Hynoski played FB for Pittsburgh. Across 3 tracked seasons, Henry Hynoski recorded 143 rushing yards, 283 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 207 primary output with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
18.8
Efficiency
46
Usage
6.1
Consistency
56.8
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 19. Utah: 36. New Hampshire: 6. Miami: 0. Florida International: 21. Notre Dame: 29. Syracuse: 6. Rutgers: 56. Louisville: 8. West Virginia: 6. Cincinnati: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 2 by 79.2. Utah: 7 by 40.2. New Hampshire: 3 by 20.8. Florida International: 3 by 72.9. Notre Dame: 6 by 20.1. Syracuse: 2 by 18.8. Rutgers: 8 by 60.4. Louisville: 1 by 66.7. West Virginia: 2 by 25. Cincinnati: 3 by 55.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | @ Kentucky | W 27-10 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Cincinnati | W 28-10 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs West Virginia | L 10-35 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Louisville | W 20-3 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Rutgers | W 41-21 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 51 | 7 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Syracuse | W 45-14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-23 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Florida International | W 44-17 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 |
| Thu 9/23 | vs Miami | L 3-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs New Hampshire | W 38-16 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Utah | L 24-27 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 5.1 |
Player Story
Henry Hynoski built his college career from 2008 through 2010 as a FB from Elysburg, PA wearing No. 27, spending time with Pittsburgh. The clearest part of Henry Hynoski's career was his receiving role: 40 catches, 283 receiving yards, 1 touchdown, and 143 rushing yards across 23 career games in the available record. His career also includes 143 rushing yards and 27 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Henry Hynoski's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 3 | 31.3 | 1.8 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 216 | 49 | 6.4 | 213 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 216 | 49 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 207 | 46 | 6.1 | -9 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 207 | 46 | 6.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Rutgers
Week 7 · W 24-17 · Conference game
Win with 65 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
65
Scrimmage Yards
70 takeover
65 scrimmage yards and 15.3 usage.
#2
vs Rutgers
Week 8 · W 41-21 · Conference game
56
Scrimmage Yards
65.9 takeover
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 13.1 usage.
#3
vs Navy
Week 3 · W 27-14
40
Scrimmage Yards
56.6 takeover
Win with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
40 scrimmage yards and 9.4 usage.
#4
@ Utah
Week 1 · L 24-27
36
Scrimmage Yards
47.7 takeover
Loss with 36 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
36 scrimmage yards and 13.5 usage.
#5
@ Navy
Week 8 · W 42-21
3
Scrimmage Yards
45.5 takeover
Win with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
207 primary output · 46 efficiency · 6.1 usage
54
#2
2010 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
54
207 primary · 46 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
52.3
216 primary · 49 efficiency · 6.4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.