Usage Score
18.4
Player Dossier
2007-2011Duke
Austin Kelly
WR • 6'2" • Mableton, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Austin Kelly reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67
Consistency
77.6
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Duke
0708091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Kelly, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Duke. Austin Kelly reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Austin Kelly played WR for Duke. Across 5 tracked seasons, Austin Kelly recorded 5 rushing yards, 1,439 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Duke.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Duke paired 625 primary output with 71.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Duke
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
48.6
Efficiency
67
Usage
18.4
Consistency
77.6
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 27. Wake Forest: 73. Alabama: 46. Army: 63. Maryland: 60. Miami: 60. Navy: 23. Boston College: 22. Georgia Tech: 45. North Carolina: 67
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 60. Wake Forest: 10 by 48.7. Alabama: 4 by 76.7. Army: 2 by 100. Maryland: 6 by 66.7. Miami: 6 by 66.7. Navy: 4 by 38.3. Boston College: 3 by 48.9. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. North Carolina: 7 by 63.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses54.5 · Games = 8
First Half53.8 · Games = 5 · +10.4 vs Second Half
Second Half43.4 · Games = 5 · -10.4 vs First Half
All Games48.6 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs North Carolina | L 19-24 | — | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Georgia Tech | L 20-30 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Boston College | L 16-21 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Navy | W 34-31 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Miami | L 13-28 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Maryland | L 16-21 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Army | L 21-35 | — | 2 | 63 | 31.5 | 31.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Alabama | L 13-62 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Wake ForestHigh volume | L 48-54 | — | 10 | 73 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2007-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Duke | 186 | 76.8 | 10.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Duke | 142 | 76.9 | 8.6 | -44 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Duke | 625 | 71.6 | 17.9 | 483 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Duke | 486 | 67 | 18.4 | -139 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Duke | 0 | — | — | -486 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wake Forest
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Army
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 48.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Duke
625 primary output · 71.6 efficiency · 17.9 usage
64.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Duke
60
486 primary · 67 efficiency · 18.4 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Duke
46.4
186 primary · 76.8 efficiency · 10.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8033
South Cobb · Avondale Estates, GA
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,439
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.