Player Dossier

2007-2010

Ohio State

Dane Sanzenbacher

WR • 5'11" • Toledo, OH, USA

Alpha targetExplosive finisher

Dane Sanzenbacher reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

24.2

Efficiency

92.8

Consistency

75.8

Season Value

73.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Ohio State

070809091010

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Ohio State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Dane Sanzenbacher, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Ohio State. Dane Sanzenbacher reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Ohio State paired 948 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 92.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

72.9

Efficiency

92.8

Usage

24.2

Consistency

75.8

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 59. Marshall: 113. Miami: 37. Ohio: 58. Eastern Michigan: 108. Illinois: 35. Indiana: 60. Wisconsin: 94. Purdue: 86. Minnesota: 67. Penn State: 58. Iowa: 102. Michigan: 71

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 3 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 100. Miami: 3 by 82.2. Ohio: 5 by 77.3. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 80. Illinois: 3 by 77.8. Indiana: 4 by 100. Wisconsin: 6 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 100. Minnesota: 5 by 89.3. Penn State: 1 by 100. Iowa: 6 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Wins71.2 · n=12
First Half67.1 · n=7 · -12.5 vs Second Half
Second Half79.7 · n=6 · +12.5 vs First Half
All Games72.9 · n=13

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Wisconsin

Best efficiency game

100 vs Arkansas

Result
Wed 1/5@ ArkansasW 31-2635919.719.70131
Sat 11/27vs MichiganW 37-737123.723.70139
Sat 11/20@ Iowa100 receiving yardsW 20-1761021717026
Sat 11/13vs Penn StateW 38-141585858158
Sun 10/31@ MinnesotaW 52-1056710.313.40039
Sat 10/23vs PurdueW 49-048621.521.50156
Sat 10/16@ WisconsinL 18-3169413.615.70026
Sat 10/9vs IndianaW 38-104601515122
Sat 10/2@ IllinoisW 24-1333511.711.70116
Sat 9/25vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volumeW 73-20910811.612431
Sat 9/18vs OhioW 43-755811.611.60021
Sat 9/11vs MiamiW 36-2433712.312.30019
Thu 9/2vs Marshall100 receiving yardsW 45-7311337.737.70165

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Ohio State

    2007-2010

    Opening stop

Season Progression

200720082009200920102010
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2007 Regular SeasonOhio State2146.79.7
2008 Regular SeasonOhio State27275.320.8251
2009 PostseasonOhio State57084.621.8298
2009 Regular SeasonOhio State57084.621.80
2010 PostseasonOhio State94892.824.2378
2010 Regular SeasonOhio State94892.824.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Penn State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

82

Primary metric

82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.

#2

Toledo

126

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Wisconsin

94

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Iowa

102

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Marshall

113

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2010 Postseason · Ohio State

948 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage

73.2

#2

2010 Regular Season · Ohio State

73.2

948 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage

#3

2009 Postseason · Ohio State

57.3

570 primary · 84.6 efficiency · 21.8 usage

Milestones

4

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2007 · Rating 0.8444

Central Catholic · Toledo, OH

Committed To
Ohio State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2007

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

1,811

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Dane Sanzenbacher quick answers

Recruiting profile

3-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
6
Career receiving yards
1,811