Usage Score
24.2
Player Dossier
2007-2010Ohio State
WR • 5'11" • Toledo, OH, USA
Dane Sanzenbacher reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.2
Efficiency
92.8
Consistency
75.8
Season Value
73.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dane Sanzenbacher, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Ohio State. Dane Sanzenbacher reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Ohio State paired 948 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
72.9
Efficiency
92.8
Usage
24.2
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 59. Marshall: 113. Miami: 37. Ohio: 58. Eastern Michigan: 108. Illinois: 35. Indiana: 60. Wisconsin: 94. Purdue: 86. Minnesota: 67. Penn State: 58. Iowa: 102. Michigan: 71
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 3 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 100. Miami: 3 by 82.2. Ohio: 5 by 77.3. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 80. Illinois: 3 by 77.8. Indiana: 4 by 100. Wisconsin: 6 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 100. Minnesota: 5 by 89.3. Penn State: 1 by 100. Iowa: 6 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/5 | @ Arkansas | W 31-26 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Michigan | W 37-7 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards | W 20-17 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Penn State | W 38-14 | — | 1 | 58 | 58 | 58 | 1 | 58 |
| Sun 10/31 | @ Minnesota | W 52-10 | — | 5 | 67 | 10.3 | 13.40 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Purdue | W 49-0 | — | 4 | 86 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 1 | 56 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Wisconsin | L 18-31 | — | 6 | 94 | 13.6 | 15.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Indiana | W 38-10 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Illinois | W 24-13 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 73-20 | — | 9 | 108 | 11.6 | 12 | 4 | 31 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Ohio | W 43-7 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Miami | W 36-24 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 9/2 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | W 45-7 | — | 3 | 113 | 37.7 | 37.70 | 1 | 65 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Ohio State | 21 | 46.7 | 9.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio State | 272 | 75.3 | 20.8 | 251 |
| 2009 Postseason | Ohio State | 570 | 84.6 | 21.8 | 298 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio State | 570 | 84.6 | 21.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio State | 948 | 92.8 | 24.2 | 378 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio State | 948 | 92.8 | 24.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Ohio State
948 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage
73.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Ohio State
73.2
948 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Ohio State
57.3
570 primary · 84.6 efficiency · 21.8 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8444
Central Catholic · Toledo, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,811
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Dane Sanzenbacher quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit