Player Stats

Jeff Blanchard College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
165
Rushing yards
125
Receiving yards
40
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic112120043.4
2008 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic7685711140.2
2009 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic00000-
2010 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic11855629047.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Florida Atlantic paired 85 primary output with 27.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 27.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Loss with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

7.7

Efficiency

27.6

Usage

4.6

Consistency

48.4

Best Game by takeover score

Troy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UAB: 8. Michigan State: 16. North Texas: 14. South Florida: 7. Arkansas State: 2. Florida International: 9. Western Kentucky: -4. Louisiana: 2. Texas: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Troy: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 41.7. Michigan State: 4 by 31.3. North Texas: 2 by 72.9. South Florida: 2 by 36.5. Arkansas State: 1 by 16.7. Florida International: 2 by 37.5. Western Kentucky: 1 by 0. Louisiana: 1 by 20.8. Texas: 2 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 0. Troy: 7 by 46

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.8 · Games = 4 · -6.3 vs Losses
Losses10 · Games = 7 · +6.3 vs Wins