Usage Score
29.5
Player Dossier
2007-2010Cincinnati
Armon Binns
WR • 6'3" • Pasadena, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Armon Binns reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.7
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
69.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati
0708090910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Armon Binns, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Armon Binns reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 1,101 primary output with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
91.8
Efficiency
81.7
Usage
29.5
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 55. Unknown: 59. NC State: 95. Oklahoma: 26. Miami (OH): 115. Louisville: 175. South Florida: 158. Syracuse: 28. West Virginia: 115. Rutgers: 139. UConn: 107. Pittsburgh: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 7 by 52.4. Unknown: 3 by 100. NC State: 6 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 57.8. Miami (OH): 5 by 100. Louisville: 8 by 100. South Florida: 12 by 87.8. Syracuse: 3 by 62.2. West Virginia: 10 by 76.7. Rutgers: 6 by 100. UConn: 9 by 79.3. Pittsburgh: 3 by 64.4
Split Comparison
Wins143 · n=3 · +66.4 vs Losses
Losses76.6 · n=8 · -66.4 vs Wins
First Half87.5 · n=6 · -8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half96 · n=6 · +8.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/4 | vs Pittsburgh | L 10-28 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-38 | — | 9 | 107 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 11/21 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 69-38 | — | 6 | 139 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-37 | — | 10 | 115 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Syracuse | L 7-31 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-38 | — | 12 | 158 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-27 | — | 8 | 175 | 21.9 | 21.90 | 3 | 62 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-3 | — | 5 | 115 | 23 | 23 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Oklahoma | L 29-31 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 9/16 | @ NC State | L 19-30 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 2 | 29 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ Fresno State | L 14-28 | — | 7 | 55 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072008200920092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 9 | 60 | 3.8 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 10 | 66.7 | 5 | 1 |
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 888 | 77.8 | 19.7 | 878 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 888 | 77.8 | 19.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,101 | 81.7 | 29.5 | 213 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
175
Primary metric
175 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
158
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati
1,101 primary output · 81.7 efficiency · 29.5 usage
69.6
#2
2009 Postseason · Cincinnati
61.9
888 primary · 77.8 efficiency · 19.7 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Cincinnati
61.9
888 primary · 77.8 efficiency · 19.7 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8111
Pasadena · Pasadena, CA
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,008
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.