Player Stats

Austin Pettis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,838
Receptions
229
Touchdowns
41

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 PostseasonBoise State11989050
2007 Regular SeasonBoise State1137376650
2008 PostseasonBoise State13465058.2
2008 Regular SeasonBoise State1345502958.2
2009 PostseasonBoise State1215080.2
2009 Regular SeasonBoise State12628501480.2
2010 PostseasonBoise State1312147182.7
2010 Regular SeasonBoise State13598041182.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Boise State paired 951 primary output with 85.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 85.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Boise State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

73.2

Efficiency

85.4

Usage

23.1

Consistency

68.7

Best Game by takeover score

Utah

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah: 147. Virginia Tech: 73. Wyoming: 88. Oregon State: 62. New Mexico State: 30. Toledo: 81. San José State: 53. Louisiana Tech: 55. Hawai'i: 122. Idaho: 31. Fresno State: 93. Nevada: 65. Utah State: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 12 by 81.7. Virginia Tech: 6 by 81.1. Wyoming: 3 by 100. Oregon State: 4 by 100. New Mexico State: 5 by 40. Toledo: 4 by 100. San José State: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 73.3. Hawai'i: 8 by 100. Idaho: 2 by 100. Fresno State: 10 by 62. Nevada: 5 by 86.7. Utah State: 4 by 85

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins73.8 · Games = 12 · +8.8 vs Losses
Losses65 · Games = 1 · -8.8 vs Wins