Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2007-2010Boise State
Austin Pettis
WR • 6'3" • Anaheim, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Austin Pettis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.4
Consistency
68.7
Season Value
69.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Boise State
0707080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Boise State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Pettis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Boise State. Austin Pettis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Boise State paired 951 primary output with 85.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Boise State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
73.2
Efficiency
85.4
Usage
23.1
Consistency
68.7
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 147. Virginia Tech: 73. Wyoming: 88. Oregon State: 62. New Mexico State: 30. Toledo: 81. San José State: 53. Louisiana Tech: 55. Hawai'i: 122. Idaho: 31. Fresno State: 93. Nevada: 65. Utah State: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 12 by 81.7. Virginia Tech: 6 by 81.1. Wyoming: 3 by 100. Oregon State: 4 by 100. New Mexico State: 5 by 40. Toledo: 4 by 100. San José State: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 73.3. Hawai'i: 8 by 100. Idaho: 2 by 100. Fresno State: 10 by 62. Nevada: 5 by 86.7. Utah State: 4 by 85
Split Comparison
Wins73.8 · n=12
First Half76.3 · n=7 · +6.8 vs Second Half
Second Half69.5 · n=6 · -6.8 vs First Half
All Games73.2 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs Idaho
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/23 | vs Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-3 | — | 12 | 147 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Utah State | W 50-14 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Nevada | L 31-34 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Fresno StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 51-0 | — | 10 | 93 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Idaho | W 52-14 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Hawai'i100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-7 | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 43 |
| Wed 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 49-20 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 10/17 | @ San José State | W 48-0 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Toledo | W 57-14 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ New Mexico State | W 59-0 | — | 5 | 30 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Oregon State | W 37-24 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Wyoming | W 51-6 | — | 3 | 88 | 29.3 | 29.30 | 1 | 58 |
| Tue 9/7 | @ Virginia Tech2+ TD | W 33-30 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 2 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boise State
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Boise State | 465 | 62.7 | 16.2 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Boise State | 465 | 62.7 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Boise State | 567 | 73.9 | 15.6 | 102 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Boise State | 567 | 73.9 | 15.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Boise State | 855 | 79.6 | 24.8 | 288 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Boise State | 855 | 79.6 | 24.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Boise State | 951 | 85.4 | 23.1 | 96 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boise State | 951 | 85.4 | 23.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
129
Primary metric
129 receiving yards with a 86 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Idaho
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Nevada
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Boise State
951 primary output · 85.4 efficiency · 23.1 usage
69.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Boise State
69.3
951 primary · 85.4 efficiency · 23.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Boise State
67.5
855 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 24.8 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8556
Orange Lutheran · Orange, CA
- Committed To
- Boise State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,838
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.