Usage Score
25.3
Player Dossier
2007-2010LSU
Terrence Toliver
WR • 6'5" • Hempstead, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Terrence Toliver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.9
Consistency
52.3
Season Value
61.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · LSU
07080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terrence Toliver, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · LSU. Terrence Toliver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
LSU paired 735 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · LSU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.5
Efficiency
80.9
Usage
25.3
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 112. North Carolina: 17. Vanderbilt: 30. Mississippi State: 35. West Virginia: 14. Tennessee: 52. Florida: 111. Unknown: 27. Auburn: 25. Alabama: 42. UL Monroe: 42. Ole Miss: 31. Arkansas: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 5 by 100. North Carolina: 3 by 37.8. Vanderbilt: 3 by 66.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 77.8. West Virginia: 2 by 46.7. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Florida: 6 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 90. Auburn: 3 by 55.6. Alabama: 3 by 93.3. UL Monroe: 3 by 93.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 3 by 91.1
Split Comparison
Wins48.6 · n=10 · +15.6 vs Losses
Losses33 · n=2 · -15.6 vs Wins
First Half53 · n=7 · +18.3 vs Second Half
Second Half34.7 · n=6 · -18.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-24 | — | 5 | 112 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 3 | 42 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Arkansas | L 23-31 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Ole Miss | W 43-36 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-0 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Alabama | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Auburn | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Florida100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 33-29 | — | 6 | 111 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Tennessee | W 16-14 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs West Virginia | W 20-14 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Mississippi State | W 29-7 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Vanderbilt | W 27-3 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ North Carolina | W 30-24 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | LSU | 249 | 90.9 | 7.7 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | LSU | 257 | 77.6 | 15 | 8 |
| 2008 Regular Season | LSU | 257 | 77.6 | 15 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | LSU | 735 | 80.2 | 30.6 | 478 |
| 2009 Regular Season | LSU | 735 | 80.2 | 30.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | LSU | 579 | 80.9 | 25.3 | -156 |
| 2010 Regular Season | LSU | 579 | 80.9 | 25.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · LSU
735 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 30.6 usage
71.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · LSU
71.6
735 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · LSU
61.6
579 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 25.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9965
Hempstead · Hempstead, TX
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,820
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.