Player Stats

Kealoha Pilares College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,491
Receptions
209
Touchdowns
30

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 PostseasonHawai'i1128037.1
2007 Regular SeasonHawai'i1124241437.1
2008 PostseasonHawai'i10316043.6
2008 Regular SeasonHawai'i1026230743.6
2009 Regular SeasonHawai'i1366690459.1
2010 PostseasonHawai'i13-0083.2
2010 Regular SeasonHawai'i13881,3061583.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Hawai'i paired 1,306 primary output with 85.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 85.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Hawai'i

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

100.5

Efficiency

85.3

Usage

25

Consistency

64.1

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. USC: 176. Army: 104. Colorado: 117. Charleston Southern: 68. Louisiana Tech: 217. Fresno State: 44. Nevada: 67. Utah State: 98. Idaho: 54. San José State: 154. New Mexico State: 50. UNLV: 157

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 5 by 100. Army: 6 by 100. Colorado: 6 by 100. Charleston Southern: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 18 by 80.4. Fresno State: 6 by 48.9. Nevada: 8 by 55.8. Utah State: 7 by 93.3. Idaho: 4 by 90. San José State: 9 by 100. New Mexico State: 6 by 55.6. UNLV: 9 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins101.3 · Games = 10 · +3.6 vs Losses
Losses97.7 · Games = 3 · -3.6 vs Wins