Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2007-2010Ball State
WR • 6'3" • Dover, OH, USA
Daniel Ifft reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.5
Efficiency
62.3
Consistency
79.5
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Ball State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daniel Ifft, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Ball State. Daniel Ifft reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Daniel Ifft played WR for Ball State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Daniel Ifft recorded 760 receiving yards and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Ball State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Ball State paired 259 primary output with 94.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
16.6
Efficiency
62.3
Usage
14.5
Consistency
79.5
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 14. Unknown: 23. Purdue: 24. Iowa: 17. Central Michigan: 5. Western Michigan: 16. Eastern Michigan: 24. Toledo: 14. Kent State: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 93.3. Unknown: 3 by 51.1. Purdue: 4 by 40. Iowa: 2 by 56.7. Central Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 46.7. Kent State: 2 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/30 | @ Kent State | L 14-33 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Toledo | L 24-31 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 38-41 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Western Michigan | L 16-45 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Central Michigan | W 31-17 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Iowa | L 0-45 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Purdue | L 13-24 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ball State
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Ball State | 83 | 54.2 | 8.3 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Ball State | 83 | 54.2 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Ball State | 259 | 94.3 | 7.5 | 176 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ball State | 269 | 80.7 | 16.2 | 10 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ball State | 149 | 62.3 | 14.5 | -120 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44
Primary metric
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Ball State
259 primary output · 94.3 efficiency · 7.5 usage
68
#2
2009 Regular Season · Ball State
64.6
269 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 16.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Ball State
52.8
149 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 14.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7989
Dover · Dover, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
760
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.