Player Stats

Rob Gronkowski College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,197
Receptions
75
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonArizona1028525665.1
2008 PostseasonArizona10427082.1
2008 Regular SeasonArizona10436451082.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Arizona paired 672 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2008 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2008 Postseason · Arizona

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

67.2

Efficiency

83.6

Usage

24.6

Consistency

62.7

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 27. UCLA: 32. Washington: 109. Stanford: 30. California: 91. USC: 12. Washington State: 83. Oregon: 143. Oregon State: 50. Arizona State: 95

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 4 by 45. UCLA: 3 by 71.1. Washington: 5 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 100. California: 6 by 100. USC: 2 by 40. Washington State: 4 by 100. Oregon: 12 by 79.4. Oregon State: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins72.8 · Games = 6 · +14.1 vs Losses
Losses58.8 · Games = 4 · -14.1 vs Wins