Usage Score
13.4
Player Dossier
2007-2011Michigan State
TE • 6'5" • St. Louis, MO, USA
Brian Linthicum reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.4
Efficiency
58.9
Consistency
27.6
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Linthicum, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Michigan State. Brian Linthicum reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Brian Linthicum played TE for Clemson and Michigan State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brian Linthicum recorded 936 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 266 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Clemson, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
30.3
Efficiency
58.9
Usage
13.4
Consistency
27.6
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 115. Unknown: 11. Notre Dame: 8. Central Michigan: 5. Michigan: 22. Wisconsin: 58. Nebraska: 16. Minnesota: 14. Iowa: 71. Indiana: 12. Northwestern: 31. Wisconsin: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 7 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 36.7. Notre Dame: 1 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Michigan: 2 by 73.3. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 53.3. Minnesota: 2 by 46.7. Iowa: 5 by 94.7. Indiana: 2 by 40. Northwestern: 3 by 68.9. Wisconsin: 1 by 6.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Georgia100 receiving yards | W 33-30 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 50 |
| Sun 12/4 | vs Wisconsin | L 39-42 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Northwestern | W 31-17 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Indiana | W 55-3 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Iowa | W 37-21 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Minnesota | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Nebraska | L 3-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Wisconsin | W 37-31 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Michigan | W 28-14 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Central Michigan | W 45-7 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Notre Dame | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2007
Opening stop
Michigan State
2009-2011
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Clemson | 76 | 40 | 5.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 266 | 80.9 | 10.6 | 190 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan State | 230 | 66.3 | 10.2 | -36 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 230 | 66.3 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan State | 364 | 58.9 | 13.4 | 134 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 364 | 58.9 | 13.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
63
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UL Monroe
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
266 primary output · 80.9 efficiency · 10.6 usage
65.9
#2
2010 Postseason · Michigan State
50.7
230 primary · 66.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Michigan State
50.7
230 primary · 66.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Steilacoom · Steilacoom, WA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
936
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.