Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2007-2010Arizona
TE • 6'3" • Oakland, CA, USA
A.J. Simmons reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.2
Efficiency
64.8
Consistency
59.5
Season Value
49.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Arizona
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Simmons, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Arizona. A.J. Simmons reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Arizona paired 132 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
13.1
Efficiency
64.8
Usage
4.2
Consistency
59.5
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 31. Iowa: 14. Oregon State: 9. Washington State: 7. UCLA: 16. USC: 11. Arizona State: 4
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 1 by 100. Iowa: 2 by 46.7. Oregon State: 1 by 60. Washington State: 1 by 46.7. UCLA: 1 by 100. USC: 1 by 73.3. Arizona State: 1 by 26.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Arizona | 3 | 20 | 3.6 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Arizona | 11 | 36.7 | 4.9 | 8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona | 132 | 76.7 | 6.1 | 121 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona | 92 | 64.8 | 4.2 | -40 |
#1 Featured game
California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Primary metric
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCLA
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Arizona
132 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 6.1 usage
62.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Arizona
49.3
92 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 4.2 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Arizona
31.5
3 primary · 20 efficiency · 3.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7956
St. Joseph · Hammonton, NJ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
238
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
A.J. Simmons quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit