Player Dossier

2007-2010

Marshall

Lee Smith

TE • 6'6" • Powell, TN, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Lee Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

17.7

Efficiency

64.4

Consistency

50.8

Season Value

57.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Marshall

0708090910

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Marshall
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Lee Smith, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Marshall. Lee Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Marshall paired 358 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 64.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UAB

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Marshall

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

32.5

Efficiency

64.4

Usage

17.7

Consistency

50.8

Best Game by takeover score

Tulane

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 8. West Virginia: 39. Ohio: 16. Southern Miss: 21. UCF: 33. East Carolina: 31. UTEP: 25. UAB: 81. Memphis: 73. SMU: 16. Tulane: 15

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 1 by 53.3. West Virginia: 4 by 65. Ohio: 2 by 53.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 70. UCF: 3 by 73.3. East Carolina: 3 by 68.9. UTEP: 4 by 41.7. UAB: 9 by 60. Memphis: 7 by 69.5. SMU: 2 by 53.3. Tulane: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Wins42 · n=5 · +17.3 vs Losses
Losses24.7 · n=6 · -17.3 vs Wins
First Half24.7 · n=6 · -17.3 vs Second Half
Second Half42 · n=5 · +17.3 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

UAB

Best efficiency game

100 vs Tulane

Result
Sat 11/27vs TulaneW 38-231151515015
Sat 11/20@ SMUL 17-312168809
Sat 11/13vs MemphisW 28-1377310.410.40132
Sat 11/6@ UABHigh volume · 2+ TDW 31-1798199214
Sat 10/30vs UTEPW 16-124256.36.30010
Sat 10/23@ East CarolinaL 10-3733110.310.30014
Thu 10/14vs UCFL 14-353331111015
Sun 10/3@ Southern MissL 16-4122110.510.50015
Sat 9/25vs OhioW 24-232168809
Fri 9/10vs West VirginiaL 21-244399.89.80018
Thu 9/2@ Ohio StateL 7-45188808

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Marshall

    2007-2010

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20072008200920092010
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2007 Regular SeasonMarshall9307.7
2008 Regular SeasonMarshall8943.113.580
2009 PostseasonMarshall33575.112.6246
2009 Regular SeasonMarshall33575.112.60
2010 Regular SeasonMarshall35864.417.723

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UTEP

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

99

Primary metric

99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

UAB

81

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

81 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.

#3

Memphis

73

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

73 receiving yards with a 69.5 efficiency score.

#4

Southern Miss

77

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.

#5

Wisconsin

53

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

53 receiving yards with a 58.9 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2010 Regular Season · Marshall

358 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 17.7 usage

57.9

#2

2009 Postseason · Marshall

56

335 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 12.6 usage

#3

2009 Regular Season · Marshall

56

335 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 12.6 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2006 · Rating 0.8822

Powell · Powell, TN

Committed To
Tennessee
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2006

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

791

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Lee Smith quick answers

Recruiting profile

3-star recruit

Position
TE
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
5
Career receiving yards
791