Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,479 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Keith Toston College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 3,232
- Rushing yards
- 2,725
- Receiving yards
- 507
- Touchdowns
- 31
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 12 | 66 | 58 | 8 | 2 | 58.2 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 12 | 657 | 573 | 84 | 6 | 58.2 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 8 | 282 | 190 | 92 | 1 | 45.9 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 33 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 49.8 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 715 | 658 | 57 | 9 | 49.8 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 46 | 41 | 5 | 1 | 78 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 1,433 | 1,177 | 256 | 12 | 78 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
113.8
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
33.9
Consistency
56.8
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 46. Georgia: 57. Houston: 87. Rice: 83. Grambling: 93. Texas A&M: 204. Missouri: 141. Baylor: 140. Texas: 80. Iowa State: 208. Texas Tech: 76. Colorado: 217. Oklahoma: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 11 by 43. Georgia: 12 by 51. Houston: 13 by 69.1. Rice: 19 by 44.2. Grambling: 8 by 98.4. Texas A&M: 28 by 61.6. Missouri: 31 by 41.6. Baylor: 19 by 76.1. Texas: 21 by 38.9. Iowa State: 26 by 83.3. Texas Tech: 22 by 36. Colorado: 32 by 64.1. Oklahoma: 10 by 49
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins135.4 · Games = 9 · +70.4 vs Losses
Losses65 · Games = 4 · -70.4 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Keith Toston
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.