Usage Score
33.9
Player Dossier
2006-2009Oklahoma State
RB • 6'0" • Angleton, TX, USA
Keith Toston leans workhorse runner traits and 58.2 efficiency.
Usage Score
33.9
Efficiency
58.2
Consistency
56.8
Season Value
62.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keith Toston, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Keith Toston leans workhorse runner traits and 58.2 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,479 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
113.8
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
33.9
Consistency
56.8
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 46. Georgia: 57. Houston: 87. Rice: 83. Unknown: 93. Texas A&M: 204. Missouri: 141. Baylor: 140. Texas: 80. Iowa State: 208. Texas Tech: 76. Colorado: 217. Oklahoma: 47
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 11 by 43. Georgia: 12 by 51. Houston: 13 by 69.1. Rice: 19 by 44.2. Unknown: 8 by 98.4. Texas A&M: 28 by 61.6. Missouri: 31 by 41.6. Baylor: 19 by 76.1. Texas: 21 by 38.9. Iowa State: 26 by 83.3. Texas Tech: 22 by 36. Colorado: 32 by 64.1. Oklahoma: 10 by 49
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
98.4 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | @ Ole Miss | L 7-21 | 10 | 41 | 4.10 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4.2 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Oklahoma | L 0-27 | 10 | 47 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Fri 11/20 | vs Colorado100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-28 | 30 | 172 | 5.70 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 6.8 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Texas Tech | W 24-17 | 22 | 76 | 3.50 | 1 | — | — | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Iowa State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-8 | 25 | 206 | 8.20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Texas | L 14-41 | 19 | 70 | 3.70 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Baylor100 rush yards | W 34-7 | 15 | 109 | 7.30 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 7.4 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Missouri | W 33-17 | 24 | 87 | 3.60 | 1 | 7 | 54 | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Texas A&M100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 36-31 | 26 | 130 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 11.6 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Rice | W 41-24 | 18 | 75 | 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Houston | L 35-45 | 10 | 66 | 6.60 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 6.7 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Georgia | W 24-10 | 11 | 55 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4.8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 723 | 61.5 | 18.5 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 723 | 61.5 | 18.5 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 282 | 73.1 | 10.3 | -441 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 748 | 61.7 | 13.7 | 466 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 748 | 61.7 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,479 | 58.2 | 33.9 | 731 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,479 | 58.2 | 33.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 177 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
177
Primary metric
177 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
#2
Colorado
217
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
217 scrimmage yards and 55.2 usage.
#3
Iowa State
208
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
208 scrimmage yards and 36.6 usage.
#4
Kansas State
109
Primary metric
Loss with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 25.5 usage.
#5
Texas A&M
204
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
204 scrimmage yards and 47.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1,479 primary output · 58.2 efficiency · 33.9 usage
62.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
62.2
1,479 primary · 58.2 efficiency · 33.9 usage
#3
2006 Postseason · Oklahoma State
50
723 primary · 61.5 efficiency · 18.5 usage
8
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8081
Camden County · Kingsland, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,232
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Keith Toston quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit