Usage Score
36.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Clemson
RB • 5'11" • Lake Butler, FL, USA
C.J. Spiller leans workhorse runner traits and 58.2 efficiency.
Usage Score
36.4
Efficiency
58.2
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
65.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C.J. Spiller, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson. C.J. Spiller leans workhorse runner traits and 58.2 efficiency.
C.J. Spiller played RB for Clemson. Across 4 tracked seasons, C.J. Spiller recorded 32 passing yards, 3,474 rushing yards, and 1,416 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Clemson paired 1,715 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
122.5
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
36.4
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 125. Middle Tennessee: 12. Georgia Tech: 156. Boston College: 79. TCU: 191. Maryland: 79. Wake Forest: 112. Miami: 185. Unknown: 27. Florida State: 232. NC State: 145. Virginia: 97. South Carolina: 37. Georgia Tech: 238
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 18 by 56.9. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 31.3. Georgia Tech: 24 by 54.3. Boston College: 18 by 46.6. TCU: 29 by 54.4. Maryland: 20 by 41.5. Wake Forest: 11 by 92.4. Miami: 20 by 74.7. Unknown: 5 by 56.3. Florida State: 25 by 85.5. NC State: 21 by 62.5. Virginia: 24 by 35.9. South Carolina: 12 by 25.3. Georgia Tech: 21 by 97.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
97.2 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | vs Kentucky | W 21-13 | 15 | 67 | 4.50 | 1 | 3 | 58 | 6.9 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Georgia Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 34-39 | 20 | 233 | 11.60 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11.3 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ South Carolina | L 17-34 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 3.1 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Virginia | W 34-21 | 19 | 58 | 3.10 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 4.0 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ NC State2+ TD | W 43-23 | 18 | 97 | 5.40 | 1 | 3 | 48 | 6.9 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Florida State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 40-24 | 22 | 165 | 7.50 | 1 | 3 | 67 | 9.3 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 1 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Miami150 scrimmage yards | W 40-37 | 14 | 81 | 5.80 | 0 | 6 | 104 | 9.3 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Wake Forest100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 38-3 | 9 | 106 | 11.80 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10.2 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Maryland | L 21-24 | 18 | 72 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4.0 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs TCU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 10-14 | 26 | 112 | 4.30 | 1 | 3 | 79 | 6.6 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Boston College | W 25-7 | 17 | 77 | 4.50 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4.4 |
| Thu 9/10 | @ Georgia Tech150 scrimmage yards | L 27-30 | 20 | 87 | 4.30 | 0 | 4 | 69 | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 37-14 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Clemson | 1,071 | 63.3 | 21.8 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,071 | 63.3 | 21.8 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Clemson | 1,039 | 54 | 22 | -32 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,039 | 54 | 22 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Clemson | 1,065 | 61.9 | 23.2 | 26 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,065 | 61.9 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Clemson | 1,715 | 58.2 | 36.4 | 650 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,715 | 58.2 | 36.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
238
Primary metric
238 scrimmage yards and 48.8 usage.
#2
Florida State
232
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
232 scrimmage yards and 48.1 usage.
#3
South Carolina
172
Primary metric
Loss with 172 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
172 scrimmage yards and 26.1 usage.
#4
Georgia Tech
166
Primary metric
Win with 166 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
166 scrimmage yards and 37.8 usage.
#5
Duke
179
Primary metric
Win with 179 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
179 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Clemson
1,715 primary output · 58.2 efficiency · 36.4 usage
65.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Clemson
65.1
1,715 primary · 58.2 efficiency · 36.4 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Clemson
54.2
1,065 primary · 61.9 efficiency · 23.2 usage
25
100+ rush yards
10
150+ scrimmage yards
12
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9919
Union County · Lake Butler, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,890
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.