Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2007-2010UL Monroe
Trey Revell
QB • 6'4" • Havana, FL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Trey Revell is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.7
Consistency
75.7
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UL Monroe
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UL Monroe
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trey Revell, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UL Monroe. Trey Revell is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UL Monroe paired 2,093 primary output with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · UL Monroe
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
209.3
Efficiency
58.7
Usage
23.1
Consistency
75.7
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 198. Unknown: 261. Arizona State: 180. Florida Atlantic: 255. Florida International: 332. Arkansas State: 92. North Texas: 312. Western Kentucky: 191. Louisiana: 132. Middle Tennessee: 140
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 34 by 47.6. Unknown: 24 by 83.9. Arizona State: 31 by 55.5. Florida Atlantic: 36 by 71.2. Florida International: 53 by 60.2. Arkansas State: 12 by 49.1. North Texas: 35 by 67.1. Western Kentucky: 27 by 56.7. Louisiana: 25 by 48.7. Middle Tennessee: 28 by 47.3
Split Comparison
Wins236.4 · n=5 · +73.9 vs Losses
Losses162.5 · n=4 · -73.9 vs Wins
First Half245.2 · n=5 · +71.8 vs Second Half
Second Half173.4 · n=5 · -71.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
83.9 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 19-38 | 8 | 17 | 91 | 47.1 | 1 | 2 | 47.3 | 11 | 49 | 4.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Louisiana | L 17-21 | 8 | 12 | 91 | 66.7 | 1 | 2 | 48.7 | 13 | 41 | 3.20 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Western Kentucky | W 21-18 | 10 | 19 | 151 | 52.6 | 0 | 2 | 56.7 | 8 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ North Texas | W 33-6 | 14 | 22 | 282 | 63.6 | 2 | 1 | 67.1 | 13 | 30 | 2.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 10/14 | vs Arkansas State | W 16-10 | 3 | 8 | 83 | 37.5 | 1 | 1 | 49.1 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Florida International3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 48-35 | 19 | 35 | 273 | 54.3 | 2 | 1 | 60.2 | 18 | 59 | 3.30 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 27-25 | 18 | 25 | 207 | 72.0 | 0 | 0 | 71.2 | 11 | 48 | 4.40 | 2 | 22 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Arizona StateDual-threat | L 14-38 | 10 | 23 | 126 | 43.5 | 2 | 2 | 55.5 | 8 | 54 | 6.80 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | 17 | 19 | 238 | 89.5 | 2 | 0 | 83.9 | 5 | 23 | 4.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Texas | L 20-59 | 14 | 30 | 197 | 46.7 | 1 | 1 | 47.6 | 4 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UL Monroe
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 293 | 66.6 | 7.3 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 285 | 65.1 | 8.5 | -8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 2,093 | 58.7 | 23.1 | 1,808 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 0 | — | — | -2,093 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
332
Primary metric
332 total offense with 60.2 efficiency.
#2
North Texas
312
Primary metric
Win with 312 yards of offense and 67.1 efficiency.
312 total offense with 67.1 efficiency.
#3
Louisiana
119
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
119 total offense with 67.7 efficiency.
#4
Florida Atlantic
255
Primary metric
Win with 255 yards of offense and 71.2 efficiency.
255 total offense with 71.2 efficiency.
#5
North Texas
219
Primary metric
Loss with 219 yards of offense and 55.9 efficiency.
219 total offense with 55.9 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · UL Monroe
2,093 primary output · 58.7 efficiency · 23.1 usage
64.2
#2
2008 Regular Season · UL Monroe
33.8
285 primary · 65.1 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · UL Monroe
26.4
293 primary · 66.6 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7
Florida State University School · Tallahassee, FL
- Committed To
- UL Monroe
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,671
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.