Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2008Texas A&M
—
Mike Goodson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
37.5
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Goodson, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Mike Goodson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 8 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2008 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.8
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
37.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 2. New Mexico: 0. Miami: 2. Army: 0. Oklahoma State: 2. Kansas State: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Oklahoma: 0. Baylor: 0. Texas: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
— vs Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ Texas | L 9-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Baylor | L 21-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Oklahoma | L 28-66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 9 | 1.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Texas Tech | L 25-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 18 | 2.30 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas State | L 30-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 2 | 80 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Army | W 21-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 20 | 1.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Miami | L 23-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 67 | 5.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ New Mexico | W 28-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 1.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Arkansas State | L 14-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 124 | 5.20 | 2 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 8 | — | — | 4 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 8 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Baylor
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Missouri
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Texas A&M
8 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
68.8
#2
2007 Regular Season · Texas A&M
57.7
8 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
55.2
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
9
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9887
Klein Collins · Spring, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Mike Goodson quick answers
Recruiting profile
5-star recruit