Player Stats

Danario Alexander College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,778
Receptions
191
Touchdowns
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2006 PostseasonMissouri7174138.6
2006 Regular SeasonMissouri714177038.6
2007 Regular SeasonMissouri937417250.6
2008 PostseasonMissouri12329142.9
2008 Regular SeasonMissouri1223300442.9
2009 PostseasonMissouri136137191.2
2009 Regular SeasonMissouri131071,6441491.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Missouri paired 1,781 primary output with 90.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 90.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Missouri

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

137

Efficiency

90.1

Usage

41.5

Consistency

74.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 137. Illinois: 132. Bowling Green: 56. Furman: 46. Nevada: 170. Nebraska: 43. Oklahoma State: 180. Texas: 74. Colorado: 123. Baylor: 214. Kansas State: 200. Iowa State: 173. Kansas: 233

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 6 by 100. Illinois: 10 by 88. Bowling Green: 7 by 53.3. Furman: 3 by 100. Nevada: 9 by 100. Nebraska: 6 by 47.8. Oklahoma State: 9 by 100. Texas: 6 by 82.2. Colorado: 8 by 100. Baylor: 13 by 100. Kansas State: 10 by 100. Iowa State: 11 by 100. Kansas: 15 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins141.6 · Games = 8 · +12.0 vs Losses
Losses129.6 · Games = 5 · -12.0 vs Wins