Usage Score
41.5
Player Dossier
2006-2009Missouri
Danario Alexander
WR • 6'5" • Marlin, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Danario Alexander reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.1
Consistency
74.5
Season Value
76.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Missouri
06060708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Danario Alexander, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Missouri. Danario Alexander reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Missouri paired 1,781 primary output with 90.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Missouri
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
137
Efficiency
90.1
Usage
41.5
Consistency
74.5
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 137. Illinois: 132. Bowling Green: 56. Unknown: 46. Nevada: 170. Nebraska: 43. Oklahoma State: 180. Texas: 74. Colorado: 123. Baylor: 214. Kansas State: 200. Iowa State: 173. Kansas: 233
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 6 by 100. Illinois: 10 by 88. Bowling Green: 7 by 53.3. Unknown: 3 by 100. Nevada: 9 by 100. Nebraska: 6 by 47.8. Oklahoma State: 9 by 100. Texas: 6 by 82.2. Colorado: 8 by 100. Baylor: 13 by 100. Kansas State: 10 by 100. Iowa State: 11 by 100. Kansas: 15 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins155.3 · n=7 · +25.7 vs Losses
Losses129.6 · n=5 · -25.7 vs Wins
First Half109.1 · n=7 · -60.4 vs Second Half
Second Half169.5 · n=6 · +60.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | vs Navy100 receiving yards | L 13-35 | — | 6 | 137 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Kansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-39 | — | 15 | 233 | 15.2 | 15.50 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-24 | — | 11 | 173 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 63 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-12 | — | 10 | 200 | 20 | 20 | 3 | 80 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Baylor100 receiving yards · High volume | L 32-40 | — | 13 | 214 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 84 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Colorado100 receiving yards · High volume | W 36-17 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 2 | 73 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Texas | L 7-41 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 10/18 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-33 | — | 9 | 180 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 50 |
| Fri 10/9 | vs Nebraska | L 12-27 | — | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Nevada100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-21 | — | 9 | 170 | 18.9 | 18.90 | 2 | 74 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Bowling Green | W 27-20 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-9 | — | 10 | 132 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200620072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Missouri | 251 | 71.3 | 9 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Missouri | 251 | 71.3 | 9 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Missouri | 417 | 74.2 | 13.5 | 166 |
| 2008 Postseason | Missouri | 329 | 71.1 | 7.7 | -88 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Missouri | 329 | 71.1 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Missouri | 1,781 | 90.1 | 41.5 | 1,452 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Missouri | 1,781 | 90.1 | 41.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
233
Primary metric
233 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas State
200
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
200 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
214
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
214 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
173
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Nebraska
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Missouri
1,781 primary output · 90.1 efficiency · 41.5 usage
76.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Missouri
76.5
1,781 primary · 90.1 efficiency · 41.5 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Missouri
43
417 primary · 74.2 efficiency · 13.5 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7222
Marlin · Marlin, TX
- Committed To
- Missouri
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,778
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.