Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2007-2010Alabama
WR • 6'4" • Phenix City, AL, USA
Earl Alexander reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.2
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
42.4
Season Value
48
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Earl Alexander, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Alabama. Earl Alexander reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Alabama paired 121 primary output with 69.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
15
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
6.2
Consistency
42.4
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 7. San José State: 9. Duke: 28. Ole Miss: 32. Tennessee: 3. Unknown: 11
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 46.7. San José State: 1 by 60. Duke: 1 by 100. Ole Miss: 2 by 100. Tennessee: 1 by 20. Unknown: 1 by 73.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Alabama | 40 | 66.7 | 16 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Alabama | 121 | 69.3 | 13.3 | 81 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Alabama | 121 | 69.3 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 52 | 80 | 7.4 | -69 |
| 2010 Postseason | Alabama | 90 | 66.7 | 6.2 | 38 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Alabama | 90 | 66.7 | 6.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50
Primary metric
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kentucky
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Alabama
121 primary output · 69.3 efficiency · 13.3 usage
60.9
#2
2008 Regular Season · Alabama
60.9
121 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Alabama
54.2
40 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 16 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9072
Central · Phenix City, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
303
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Earl Alexander quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit