Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2006-2009Michigan
WR • 6'3" • USA
Greg Mathews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.8
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
45.1
Season Value
58.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Greg Mathews, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Michigan. Greg Mathews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Michigan paired 409 primary output with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
29.3
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
20.8
Consistency
45.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 18. Notre Dame: 68. Eastern Michigan: 0. Indiana: 0. Michigan State: 0. Iowa: 0. Unknown: 14. Penn State: 70. Illinois: 34. Purdue: 28. Wisconsin: 53. Ohio State: 67
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 2 by 60. Notre Dame: 5 by 90.7. Unknown: 1 by 93.3. Penn State: 7 by 66.7. Illinois: 3 by 75.6. Purdue: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 4 by 88.3. Ohio State: 6 by 74.4
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | vs Ohio State | L 10-21 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 24-45 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Purdue | L 36-38 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Illinois | L 13-38 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Penn State | L 10-35 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Iowa | L 28-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Michigan State | L 20-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Indiana | W 36-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 45-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Notre Dame | W 38-34 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Western Michigan | W 31-7 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Michigan | 68 | 63.9 | 12.5 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Michigan | 366 | 58.5 | 16.8 | 298 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Michigan | 366 | 58.5 | 16.8 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan | 409 | 74.1 | 23.9 | 43 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 352 | 81.1 | 20.8 | -57 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Illinois
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Michigan
409 primary output · 74.1 efficiency · 23.9 usage
64.9
#2
2009 Regular Season · Michigan
58.1
352 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 20.8 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Michigan
54.9
366 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 16.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9249
Edgewater · Orlando, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,195
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Greg Mathews quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit