Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2008-2010Tulane
Cody Sparks
TE • 6'4" • Bridge City, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Cody Sparks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.2
Consistency
57
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane
080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Sparks, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane. Cody Sparks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Tulane paired 427 primary output with 65.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
38.8
Efficiency
65.2
Usage
17.6
Consistency
57
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 10. Houston: 25. Rutgers: 37. Army: 22. Tulsa: 83. UTEP: 12. SMU: 37. Southern Miss: 34. Rice: 53. UCF: 15. Marshall: 99
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Houston: 2 by 83.3. Rutgers: 6 by 41.1. Army: 2 by 73.3. Tulsa: 7 by 79. UTEP: 2 by 40. SMU: 3 by 82.2. Southern Miss: 3 by 75.6. Rice: 7 by 50.5. UCF: 4 by 25. Marshall: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins34 · n=3 · -11 vs Losses
Losses45 · n=7 · +11 vs Wins
First Half31.5 · n=6 · -16.1 vs Second Half
Second Half47.6 · n=5 · +16.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Marshall | L 23-38 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs UCF | L 14-61 | — | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Rice2+ TD | W 54-49 | — | 7 | 53 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 2 | 23 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Southern Miss | L 30-46 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs SMU | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ UTEP | W 34-24 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Tulsa | L 24-52 | — | 7 | 83 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Army | L 23-41 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Rutgers | W 17-14 | — | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Houston | L 23-42 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 13 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 245 | 74.8 | 11.3 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 81 | 47.1 | 10.2 | -164 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 427 | 65.2 | 17.6 | 346 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UL Monroe
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 79 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
427 primary output · 65.2 efficiency · 17.6 usage
59.5
#2
2008 Regular Season · Tulane
52.7
245 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 11.3 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
33.9
81 primary · 47.1 efficiency · 10.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8111
Bridge City · Bridge City, TX
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
753
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.