Player Dossier

2006-2009

Ole Miss

Shay Hodge

WR • 6'2" • Morton, MS, USA

Alpha targetExplosive finisher

Shay Hodge reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

33.2

Efficiency

93

Consistency

76.8

Season Value

75.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Ole Miss

060708080909

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Ole Miss
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Shay Hodge, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Ole Miss. Shay Hodge reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Shay Hodge played WR for Ole Miss. Across 4 tracked seasons, Shay Hodge recorded 2,646 receiving yards and 22 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Ole Miss.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Ole Miss paired 1,135 primary output with 93 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 93 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Ole Miss

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

87.3

Efficiency

93

Usage

33.2

Consistency

76.8

Best Game by takeover score

Oklahoma State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 112. Memphis: 77. Unknown: 59. South Carolina: 11. Vanderbilt: 122. Alabama: 21. UAB: 99. Arkansas: 70. Auburn: 105. Unknown: 169. Tennessee: 77. LSU: 117. Mississippi State: 96

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 7 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 78.7. South Carolina: 1 by 73.3. Vanderbilt: 8 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 70. UAB: 7 by 94.3. Arkansas: 5 by 93.3. Auburn: 7 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 100. LSU: 7 by 100. Mississippi State: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins96.3 · Games = 7 · +38.0 vs Losses
Losses58.3 · Games = 4 · -38.0 vs Wins
First Half71.6 · Games = 7 · -34.1 vs Second Half
Second Half105.7 · Games = 6 · +34.1 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Unknown

Best efficiency game

100 vs Oklahoma State

Result
Sat 1/2vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yardsW 21-771121616033
Sat 11/28@ Mississippi StateL 27-416961616125
Sat 11/21vs LSU100 receiving yardsW 25-23711716.716.70127
Sat 11/14vs TennesseeW 42-1757715.415.40018
Sun 11/8vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD716924.124.10265
Sat 10/31@ Auburn100 receiving yardsL 20-3371051515043
Sat 10/24vs ArkansasW 30-175701414125
Sat 10/17vs UABW 48-1379914.114.10038
Sat 10/10vs AlabamaL 3-2222110.510.50013
Sat 10/3@ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volumeW 23-7812215.315.30248
Thu 9/24@ South CarolinaL 10-161111111011
Sat 9/19vs Unknown55911.811.80120
Sun 9/6@ MemphisW 45-1437725.725.70033

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Ole Miss

    2006-2009

    Opening stop

Season Progression

200620072008200820092009
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2006 Regular SeasonOle Miss19382.116.6
2007 Regular SeasonOle Miss59384.222400
2008 PostseasonOle Miss72585.124.2132
2008 Regular SeasonOle Miss72585.124.20
2009 PostseasonOle Miss1,1359333.2410
2009 Regular SeasonOle Miss1,1359333.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

169

Primary metric

169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Unknown

88

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Florida

133

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

LSU

90

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

LSU

117

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2009 Postseason · Ole Miss

1,135 primary output · 93 efficiency · 33.2 usage

75.8

#2

2009 Regular Season · Ole Miss

75.8

1,135 primary · 93 efficiency · 33.2 usage

#3

2008 Postseason · Ole Miss

61.7

725 primary · 85.1 efficiency · 24.2 usage

Milestones

6

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2020 · Rating 0.8067

Toms River North · Toms River, NJ

Committed To
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2020

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

2,646

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.