Usage Score
12.9
Player Dossier
2007-2010Rice
Patrick Randolph
WR • 5'11" • Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Patrick Randolph reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
62
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Randolph, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice. Patrick Randolph reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rice paired 332 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Rice
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
30.2
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
12.9
Consistency
62
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 39. North Texas: 11. Baylor: 45. SMU: 52. UTEP: 12. Houston: 2. UCF: 0. Tulsa: 50. Tulane: 51. East Carolina: 17. UAB: 53
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 2 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 36.7. Baylor: 3 by 100. SMU: 4 by 86.7. UTEP: 1 by 80. Houston: 1 by 13.3. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 100. East Carolina: 1 by 100. UAB: 4 by 88.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins20.8 · Games = 4 · -14.8 vs Losses
Losses35.6 · Games = 7 · +14.8 vs Wins
First Half26.8 · Games = 6 · -7.4 vs Second Half
Second Half34.2 · Games = 5 · +7.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs UAB | W 28-23 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs East Carolina | W 62-38 | — | 1 | 17 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Tulane | L 49-54 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Tulsa | L 27-64 | — | 1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ UCF | L 14-41 | — | — | — | 35 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Houston | W 34-31 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 10/10 | @ UTEP | L 24-44 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs SMU | L 31-42 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Baylor | L 13-30 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ North Texas | W 32-31 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Texas | L 17-34 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Rice | 51 | 68.9 | 4.1 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Rice | 164 | 63.7 | 10.4 | 113 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 356 | 56.8 | 15.8 | 192 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 332 | 80.5 | 12.9 | -24 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53
Primary metric
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 77.5 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Rice
332 primary output · 80.5 efficiency · 12.9 usage
61.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Rice
52.3
356 primary · 56.8 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Rice
46.1
164 primary · 63.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7444
Paul W. Bryant · Cottondale, AL
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
903
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.