Usage Score
24.1
Player Dossier
2006-2009Rice
Toren Dixon
WR • 6'3" • Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Toren Dixon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60.5
Consistency
39.9
Season Value
55.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Rice
060607080809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Toren Dixon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Rice. Toren Dixon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Rice paired 598 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Rice
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
55
Efficiency
60.5
Usage
24.1
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 65. Texas Tech: 9. Oklahoma State: 120. Vanderbilt: 40. Tulsa: 8. Navy: 26. East Carolina: 115. UCF: 54. SMU: 32. Tulane: 158. UTEP: 4. Houston: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 9 by 48.1. Texas Tech: 1 by 60. Oklahoma State: 9 by 88.9. Vanderbilt: 4 by 66.7. Tulsa: 2 by 26.7. Navy: 3 by 57.8. East Carolina: 8 by 95.8. UCF: 6 by 60. SMU: 7 by 30.5. Tulane: 7 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 26.7. Houston: 3 by 64.4
Split Comparison
Wins81 · n=2 · +31.2 vs Losses
Losses49.8 · n=10 · -31.2 vs Wins
First Half44.7 · n=6 · -20.7 vs Second Half
Second Half65.3 · n=6 · +20.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/29 | @ Houston | L 14-73 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UTEP | W 30-29 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 28-20 | — | 7 | 158 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 3 | 70 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ SMU | L 28-31 | — | 7 | 32 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UCF | L 7-49 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-49 | — | 8 | 115 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Navy | L 14-63 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Tulsa | L 10-27 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Vanderbilt | L 17-36 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-41 | — | 9 | 120 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 72 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Texas Tech | L 10-55 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ UABHigh volume | L 24-44 | — | 9 | 65 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620062007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Rice | 40 | 56.3 | 6.2 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Rice | 40 | 56.3 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Rice | 443 | 61.5 | 15.4 | 403 |
| 2008 Postseason | Rice | 598 | 71.5 | 15.8 | 155 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Rice | 598 | 71.5 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 660 | 60.5 | 24.1 | 62 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
120
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Rice
598 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 15.8 usage
60.1
#2
2008 Regular Season · Rice
60.1
598 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Rice
55.8
660 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 24.1 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7989
Redemptorist · Baton Rouge, LA
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,741
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.