Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,404 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Louisville | 12 | 32 | 11 | 21 | 2 | 49 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Louisville | 12 | 422 | 395 | 27 | 12 | 49 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Louisville | 12 | 849 | 696 | 153 | 9 | 49.5 |
| 2009 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 14 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 51.3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 14 | 709 | 597 | 112 | 6 | 51.3 |
| 2010 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 13 | 91 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 77.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13 | 1,313 | 1,225 | 88 | 7 | 77.8 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,404 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisville, Georgia Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
108
Efficiency
58.6
Usage
29.6
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 91. South Carolina State: 28. Kansas: 89. North Carolina: 115. NC State: 85. Wake Forest: 63. Virginia: 195. Middle Tennessee: 75. Clemson: 130. Virginia Tech: 125. Miami: 77. Duke: 165. Georgia: 166
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 23 by 41.2. South Carolina State: 6 by 48.6. Kansas: 11 by 83.7. North Carolina: 20 by 59.9. NC State: 15 by 39.2. Wake Forest: 10 by 65.6. Virginia: 25 by 81.3. Middle Tennessee: 13 by 60.1. Clemson: 19 by 62.3. Virginia Tech: 23 by 56.6. Miami: 15 by 53.5. Duke: 34 by 50.6. Georgia: 29 by 59.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.