Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2007-2010UAB
Jeffery Anderson
TE • 6'3" • Selma, AL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jeffery Anderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.8
Consistency
61.1
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeffery Anderson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB. Jeffery Anderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UAB paired 398 primary output with 79.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UAB
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
45.2
Efficiency
65.8
Usage
15.4
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 5. Troy: 17. Tennessee: 53. UTEP: 93. Mississippi State: 1. Marshall: 31. East Carolina: 82. Memphis: 80. Rice: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 1 by 33.3. Troy: 2 by 56.7. Tennessee: 3 by 100. UTEP: 4 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 6.7. Marshall: 3 by 68.9. East Carolina: 7 by 78.1. Memphis: 6 by 88.9. Rice: 5 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins63.3 · n=3 · +27.2 vs Losses
Losses36.2 · n=6 · -27.2 vs Wins
First Half33.8 · n=5 · -25.7 vs Second Half
Second Half59.5 · n=4 · +25.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Rice | L 23-28 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Memphis | W 31-15 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 52 |
| Fri 11/12 | vs East Carolina2+ TD | L 42-54 | — | 7 | 82 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Marshall | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Mississippi State | L 24-29 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UTEP | W 21-6 | — | 4 | 93 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tennessee | L 29-32 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Troy | W 34-33 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ SMU | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 216 | 75.6 | 9 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 368 | 77.7 | 12.6 | 152 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 398 | 79.3 | 15.9 | 30 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 407 | 65.8 | 15.4 | 9 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
88
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · UAB
398 primary output · 79.3 efficiency · 15.9 usage
61.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · UAB
60.3
407 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 15.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UAB
58.9
368 primary · 77.7 efficiency · 12.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8111
Southside · Selma, AL
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,389
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.