Usage Score
25.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010Fresno State
Jamel Hamler
WR • 6'2" • San Leandro, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jamel Hamler reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.7
Consistency
69.3
Season Value
70.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Fresno State
07070809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamel Hamler, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Fresno State. Jamel Hamler reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Fresno State paired 812 primary output with 88.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
67.7
Efficiency
88.7
Usage
25.7
Consistency
69.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 87. Cincinnati: 53. Utah State: 69. Ole Miss: 130. Hawai'i: 65. New Mexico State: 9. San José State: 44. Louisiana Tech: 118. Nevada: 37. Boise State: 37. Idaho: 71. Illinois: 92
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 7 by 82.9. Cincinnati: 5 by 70.7. Utah State: 4 by 100. Ole Miss: 8 by 100. Hawai'i: 3 by 100. New Mexico State: 1 by 60. San José State: 2 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 98.3. Nevada: 3 by 82.2. Boise State: 3 by 82.2. Idaho: 3 by 100. Illinois: 7 by 87.6
Split Comparison
Wins65.1 · n=7 · -6.1 vs Losses
Losses71.2 · n=5 · +6.1 vs Wins
First Half68.8 · n=6 · +2.3 vs Second Half
Second Half66.5 · n=6 · -2.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Idaho
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs Northern Illinois | L 17-40 | — | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Illinois | W 25-23 | — | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Idaho | W 23-20 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Boise State | L 0-51 | — | 3 | 37 | 9 | 12.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Nevada | L 34-35 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-34 | — | 8 | 118 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 3 | 33 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ San José State | W 33-18 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs New Mexico State | W 33-10 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Hawai'i | L 27-49 | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Ole Miss100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-55 | — | 8 | 130 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Utah State | W 41-24 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Cincinnati | W 28-14 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Fresno State
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200720082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Fresno State | 80 | 86.7 | 7.5 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Fresno State | 80 | 86.7 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | — | — | -80 |
| 2009 Postseason | Fresno State | 503 | 77.3 | 22.7 | 503 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Fresno State | 503 | 77.3 | 22.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Fresno State | 812 | 88.7 | 25.7 | 309 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Fresno State | 812 | 88.7 | 25.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wyoming
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 81 efficiency score.
#4
Nevada
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas State
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Fresno State
812 primary output · 88.7 efficiency · 25.7 usage
70.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Fresno State
70.9
812 primary · 88.7 efficiency · 25.7 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Fresno State
57.7
503 primary · 77.3 efficiency · 22.7 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7889
San Leandro · San Leandro, CA
- Committed To
- Fresno State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,395
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.