Usage Score
33
Player Dossier
2006-2009Arkansas
Damian Williams
WR • 6'1" • Springdale, AR, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Damian Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.1
Consistency
70
Season Value
71.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · USC
0608080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arkansas • USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Damian Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · USC. Damian Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
USC paired 1,010 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · USC
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
84.2
Efficiency
84.1
Usage
33
Consistency
70
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 189. San José State: 67. Ohio State: 51. Washington: 40. Washington State: 100. California: 101. Notre Dame: 108. Oregon State: 58. Oregon: 82. Arizona State: 81. UCLA: 82. Arizona: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 12 by 100. San José State: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 5 by 68. Washington: 3 by 88.9. Washington State: 5 by 100. California: 8 by 84.2. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. Oregon State: 6 by 64.4. Oregon: 9 by 60.7. Arizona State: 2 by 100. UCLA: 5 by 100. Arizona: 8 by 42.5
Split Comparison
Wins93 · n=9 · +35.3 vs Losses
Losses57.7 · n=3 · -35.3 vs Wins
First Half91.3 · n=6 · +14.3 vs Second Half
Second Half77 · n=6 · -14.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/27 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-13 | — | 12 | 189 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs ArizonaHigh volume | L 17-21 | — | 8 | 51 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs UCLA | W 28-7 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 48 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Arizona State | W 14-9 | — | 2 | 81 | 40.5 | 40.50 | 1 | 75 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ OregonHigh volume | L 20-47 | — | 9 | 82 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Oregon State | W 42-36 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 34-27 | — | 4 | 108 | 23.4 | 27 | 2 | 41 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ California100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-3 | — | 8 | 101 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Washington State100 receiving yards | W 27-6 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Washington | L 13-16 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Ohio State | W 18-15 | — | 5 | 51 | 9.7 | 10.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs San José State | W 56-3 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2006
Opening stop
- 2
USC
2008-2009
Final stop
Season Progression
20062008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Arkansas | 235 | 65.2 | 18.1 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | USC | 869 | 87.2 | 22.2 | 634 |
| 2008 Regular Season | USC | 869 | 87.2 | 22.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | USC | 1,010 | 84.1 | 33 | 141 |
| 2009 Regular Season | USC | 1,010 | 84.1 | 33 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
189
Primary metric
189 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
162
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
USC
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon State
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · USC
1,010 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 33 usage
71.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · USC
71.8
1,010 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 33 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · USC
69.4
869 primary · 87.2 efficiency · 22.2 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9677
Springdale · Springdale, AR
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,114
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.