Usage Score
14.6
Player Profile
Trevor Vittatoe
QB • 6'2" • Bedford, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Trevor Vittatoe is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
56.5
Consistency
72.5
Season Value
57.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UTEP
0708091010
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- UTEP
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UTEP
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Trevor Vittatoe, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UTEP. Trevor Vittatoe is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
UTEP paired 3,243 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with 365 yards of offense and 72.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · UTEP
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
219.5
Efficiency
56.5
Usage
14.6
Consistency
72.5
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 202. Unknown: 231. Houston: 365. New Mexico State: 300. Memphis: 162. New Mexico: 287. Rice: 335. UAB: 168. Tulane: 107. Marshall: 236. SMU: 194. Arkansas: 158. Tulsa: 109
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 37 by 44.3. Unknown: 31 by 56. Houston: 57 by 72.8. New Mexico State: 33 by 82.9. Memphis: 37 by 44.9. New Mexico: 40 by 72.5. Rice: 34 by 71.1. UAB: 37 by 37.9. Tulane: 24 by 41.7. Marshall: 48 by 50.4. SMU: 32 by 60.7. Arkansas: 26 by 54.2. Tulsa: 26 by 44.6
Split Comparison
Wins255.6 · n=5 · +63.5 vs Losses
Losses192.1 · n=7 · -63.5 vs Wins
First Half268.9 · n=7 · +106.9 vs Second Half
Second Half162 · n=6 · -106.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
82.9 vs New Mexico State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU3+ TD | L 24-52 | 14 | 29 | 245 | 48.3 | 3 | 3 | 44.3 | 8 | -43 | -5.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa | L 28-31 | 8 | 22 | 100 | 36.4 | 0 | 1 | 44.6 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas | L 21-58 | 13 | 21 | 151 | 61.9 | 0 | 1 | 54.2 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU3+ TD | W 28-14 | 17 | 28 | 183 | 60.7 | 3 | 0 | 60.7 | 4 | 11 | 2.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | 22 | 40 | 229 | 55.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.4 | 8 | 7 | 0.90 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | 10 | 21 | 102 | 47.6 | 1 | 2 | 41.7 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | 15 | 33 | 169 | 45.5 | 0 | 3 | 37.9 | 4 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 44-24 | 19 | 32 | 327 | 59.4 | 3 | 0 | 71.1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico3+ TD | W 38-20 | 20 | 37 | 264 | 54.1 | 3 | 0 | 72.5 | 3 | 23 | 7.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | 16 | 33 | 171 | 48.5 | 0 | 1 | 44.9 | 4 | -9 | -2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-10 | 19 | 30 | 246 | 63.3 | 5 | 0 | 82.9 | 3 | 54 | 18 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 24-54 | 30 | 54 | 340 | 55.6 | 3 | 0 | 72.8 | 3 | 25 | 8.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | 17 | 27 | 229 | 63.0 | 0 | 1 | 56 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 2,736 | 56.5 | 12.3 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 3,243 | 58.6 | 14.5 | 507 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 3,225 | 54.8 | 13.2 | -18 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 2,854 | 56.5 | 14.6 | -371 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 2,854 | 56.5 | 14.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Win with 517 yards of offense and 90 efficiency.
517
Primary metric
517 total offense with 90 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
199
Primary metric
Game with 199 yards of offense and 87.5 efficiency.
199 total offense with 87.5 efficiency.
#3
Houston
365
Primary metric
Loss with 365 yards of offense and 72.8 efficiency.
365 total offense with 72.8 efficiency.
#4
SMU
412
Primary metric
Win with 412 yards of offense and 67.8 efficiency.
412 total offense with 67.8 efficiency.
#5
Houston
389
Primary metric
Loss with 389 yards of offense and 73.6 efficiency.
389 total offense with 73.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
3,243 primary output · 58.6 efficiency · 14.5 usage
63.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
59.7
3,225 primary · 54.8 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · UTEP
58.5
2,736 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 12.3 usage
Milestones
28
250+ passing yards
14
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
16
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8111
Trinity · Euless, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
12,058
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.