Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2008-2010UTEP
Jonny Moore
TE • 6'5" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jonny Moore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
45.8
Consistency
52.2
Season Value
38.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UTEP
080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonny Moore, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UTEP. Jonny Moore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UTEP paired 135 primary output with 72.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 45.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
11
Efficiency
45.8
Usage
8.2
Consistency
52.2
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 26. New Mexico State: 7. Rice: 15. UAB: 2. Arkansas: 10. Tulsa: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 57.8. New Mexico State: 1 by 46.7. Rice: 2 by 50. UAB: 1 by 13.3. Arkansas: 1 by 66.7. Tulsa: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins11 · n=2 · +0 vs Losses
Losses11 · n=4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half16 · n=3 · +10 vs Second Half
Second Half6 · n=3 · -10 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Arkansas
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 10 | 33.4 | 4.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 135 | 72.6 | 9.1 | 125 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 66 | 45.8 | 8.2 | -69 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Primary metric
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 57.8 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
7
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
135 primary output · 72.6 efficiency · 9.1 usage
64.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
38.6
66 primary · 45.8 efficiency · 8.2 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
28.8
10 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 4.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8
Marshall · San Antonio, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
211
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.