Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2007-2010UTEP
Pierce Hunter
WR • 6'5" • National City, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Pierce Hunter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.3
Consistency
36.2
Season Value
53.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UTEP
0708091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Pierce Hunter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UTEP. Pierce Hunter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Pierce Hunter played WR for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Pierce Hunter recorded 481 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UTEP paired 280 primary output with 68.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · UTEP
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
28
Efficiency
68.3
Usage
11.1
Consistency
36.2
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 27. Unknown: 9. Houston: 7. New Mexico State: 45. New Mexico: 17. Rice: 105. UAB: 17. Marshall: 21. SMU: 24. Arkansas: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 3 by 60. Unknown: 1 by 60. Houston: 1 by 46.7. New Mexico State: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 2 by 56.7. Rice: 5 by 100. UAB: 2 by 56.7. Marshall: 2 by 70. SMU: 2 by 80. Arkansas: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins47.8 · Games = 4 · +31.8 vs Losses
Losses16 · Games = 5 · -31.8 vs Wins
First Half21 · Games = 5 · -14 vs Second Half
Second Half35 · Games = 5 · +14 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU | L 24-52 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas | L 21-58 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice100 receiving yards | W 44-24 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico | W 38-20 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-10 | — | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston | L 24-54 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 50 | 46.7 | 5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 72 | 79.2 | 5.5 | 22 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 79 | 68.7 | 7.2 | 7 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 280 | 68.3 | 11.1 | 201 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 280 | 68.3 | 11.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Miss
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · UTEP
280 primary output · 68.3 efficiency · 11.1 usage
53.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
53.9
280 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
47.6
72 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8167
Bonita Vista · Chula Vista, CA
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
481
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.