Usage Score
12.8
Player Dossier
2007-2010UTEP
Evan Davis
WR • 6'1" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Evan Davis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.6
Consistency
63.7
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UTEP
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Evan Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UTEP. Evan Davis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
UTEP paired 292 primary output with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
26.5
Efficiency
74.6
Usage
12.8
Consistency
63.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 12. New Mexico State: 25. Memphis: 19. New Mexico: 50. Rice: 3. UAB: 8. Tulane: 32. Marshall: 47. SMU: 44. Arkansas: 19. Tulsa: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 2 by 40. New Mexico State: 2 by 83.3. Memphis: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 6 by 55.6. Rice: 1 by 20. UAB: 1 by 53.3. Tulane: 3 by 71.1. Marshall: 3 by 100. SMU: 3 by 97.8. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins28.2 · Games = 5 · +3.0 vs Losses
Losses25.2 · Games = 6 · -3.0 vs Wins
First Half19.5 · Games = 6 · -15.5 vs Second Half
Second Half35 · Games = 5 · +15.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa | L 28-31 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas | L 21-58 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice | W 44-24 | — | 1 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico | W 38-20 | — | 6 | 50 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-10 | — | 2 | 25 | 7.7 | 12.50 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston | L 24-54 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 11 | 73.3 | 6.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 217 | 69.6 | 9.8 | 206 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 186 | 57.9 | 10.3 | -31 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 292 | 74.6 | 12.8 | 106 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46
Primary metric
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
292 primary output · 74.6 efficiency · 12.8 usage
61.7
#2
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
52.9
217 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · UTEP
45.9
11 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7667
Oceanside · Oceanside, CA
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
706
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.