Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2007-2010UTEP
Kris Adams
WR • 6'3" • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kris Adams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.7
Consistency
65
Season Value
69.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UTEP
0708091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kris Adams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UTEP. Kris Adams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UTEP paired 1,070 primary output with 94.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · UTEP
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
82.3
Efficiency
94.7
Usage
20
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 153. Unknown: 48. Houston: 114. New Mexico State: 86. Memphis: 30. New Mexico: 141. Rice: 134. UAB: 44. Tulane: 28. Marshall: 82. SMU: 36. Arkansas: 148. Tulsa: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Houston: 7 by 100. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Memphis: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 5 by 100. Rice: 5 by 100. UAB: 4 by 73.3. Tulane: 1 by 100. Marshall: 6 by 91.1. SMU: 3 by 80. Arkansas: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins85.4 · n=5 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses85 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half100.9 · n=7 · +40.2 vs Second Half
Second Half60.7 · n=6 · -40.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 24-52 | — | 3 | 153 | 51 | 51 | 3 | 67 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards | L 21-58 | — | 5 | 148 | 29.6 | 29.60 | 1 | 60 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 44-24 | — | 5 | 134 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 3 | 73 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 38-20 | — | 5 | 141 | 28.2 | 28.20 | 2 | 49 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | — | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State2+ TD | W 42-10 | — | 3 | 86 | 28.7 | 28.70 | 2 | 68 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston100 receiving yards | L 24-54 | — | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 49 | 58.3 | 5.2 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 958 | 87.4 | 19.3 | 909 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 580 | 75.8 | 17.8 | -378 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 1,070 | 94.7 | 20 | 490 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,070 | 94.7 | 20 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Primary metric
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
145
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
153
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · UTEP
1,070 primary output · 94.7 efficiency · 20 usage
69.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
69.9
1,070 primary · 94.7 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
68.6
958 primary · 87.4 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7889
Everman · Fort Worth, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,657
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.