Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2006-2009Baylor
Ernest Smith
WR • 6'3" • New Orleans, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Ernest Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
49.9
Consistency
36.5
Season Value
48.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Baylor
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ernest Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Baylor. Ernest Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ernest Smith played WR for Baylor. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ernest Smith recorded 33 passing yards, 5 rushing yards, and 837 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Baylor.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Baylor paired 175 primary output with 81.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 49.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Baylor
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
32.7
Efficiency
49.9
Usage
16.5
Consistency
36.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0. Unknown: 0. Kent State: 30. Oklahoma: 71. Iowa State: 125. Oklahoma State: 33. Nebraska: 21. Missouri: 7. Texas: 15. Texas A&M: 43. Texas Tech: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 0. Kent State: 4 by 50. Oklahoma: 6 by 78.9. Iowa State: 7 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 36.7. Nebraska: 2 by 70. Missouri: 3 by 15.6. Texas: 2 by 50. Texas A&M: 6 by 47.8. Texas Tech: 2 by 50
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins12.3 · Games = 3 · -33.8 vs Losses
Losses46.1 · Games = 7 · +33.8 vs Wins
First Half43.2 · Games = 6 · +23.0 vs Second Half
Second Half20.2 · Games = 5 · -23.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Texas Tech | L 13-20 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Texas A&M | L 3-38 | — | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Texas | L 14-47 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Missouri | W 40-32 | — | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 2.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Nebraska | L 10-20 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Oklahoma State | L 7-34 | — | 6 | 33 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards | L 10-24 | — | 7 | 125 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Oklahoma | L 7-33 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Kent State | W 31-15 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Wake Forest | W 24-21 | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Baylor
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Baylor | 55 | 61.7 | 6.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Baylor | 247 | 70.5 | 9 | 192 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Baylor | 175 | 81.3 | 11.8 | -72 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Baylor | 360 | 49.9 | 16.5 | 185 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
59
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Baylor
175 primary output · 81.3 efficiency · 11.8 usage
51
#2
2007 Regular Season · Baylor
50.7
247 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Baylor
48.2
360 primary · 49.9 efficiency · 16.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.807
ProKick Australia · Australia, AUST
- Committed To
- California
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
837
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.