Usage Score
16.8
Player Dossier
2008-2010Wake Forest
Marshall Williams
WR • 6'1" • Durham, NC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Marshall Williams reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.3
Consistency
41.2
Season Value
38.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest
08080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marshall Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Marshall Williams reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Marshall Williams played WR for Wake Forest. Across 3 tracked seasons, Marshall Williams recorded 174 passing yards, 7 rushing yards, and 1,529 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Wake Forest.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 867 primary output with 83.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
27.2
Efficiency
66.3
Usage
16.8
Consistency
41.2
Best Game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 39. Duke: 51. Stanford: 8. Florida State: 14. Georgia Tech: 16. Navy: 12. Maryland: 62. Boston College: 10. Clemson: 48. Vanderbilt: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 53.3. Florida State: 2 by 46.7. Georgia Tech: 1 by 100. Navy: 3 by 26.7. Maryland: 5 by 82.7. Boston College: 2 by 33.3. Clemson: 4 by 80. Vanderbilt: 2 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins31.5 · Games = 2 · +7.2 vs Losses
Losses24.3 · Games = 7 · -7.2 vs Wins
First Half25.6 · Games = 5 · -3.2 vs Second Half
Second Half28.8 · Games = 5 · +3.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | @ Vanderbilt | W 34-13 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Clemson | L 10-30 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Boston College | L 13-23 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Maryland | L 14-62 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Navy | L 27-28 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Georgia Tech | L 20-24 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Florida State | L 0-31 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Stanford | L 24-68 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Duke2+ TD | W 54-48 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 2 | 38 |
| Thu 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Wake Forest | 390 | 77 | 12.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 390 | 77 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 867 | 83.4 | 21.2 | 477 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 272 | 66.3 | 16.8 | -595 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
NC State
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Maryland
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 99.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest
867 primary output · 83.4 efficiency · 21.2 usage
65.4
#2
2008 Postseason · Wake Forest
45.6
390 primary · 77 efficiency · 12.5 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Wake Forest
45.6
390 primary · 77 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7889
Rock Bridge · Columbia, MO
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,529
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.